I dunno tbh! All I know is that I'd much rather see a clear run-off than a turbid one . It's only natural,innit?? If anyone can convince me that a clear one is in no way superior to a cloudy one,I may well reconsider!Scooby wrote:Why the obsession with clear run off?
I don't think anyone has explained how a clear run off from the tun improves the finished beer, or why not having a clear run off is detrimental.
Fly or batch sparge?
-
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:08 am
- Location: Barnsley,SouthYorkshire
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
No idea either, as long as the big chunky bits of grain and husk get held back who cares?Scooby wrote:Why the obsession with clear run off?
I don't think anyone has explained how a clear run off from the tun improves the finished beer, or why not having a clear run off is detrimental.
Chris did post a link to a (very technical) article about why obtaining a clear run off could actually be bad for the beer . . . I read it, didn't absorb it . . . and forgot to bookmark it
Oh and I can't vote as I choose one or the other depending on how I'm feeling, and how much space there is in the mash tun at the time
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
I batch sparge and get clear run off. I do use a pump to recirculate so I'm not actually there with a jug so I pay little attention to the volume it takes to do it. Five minutes tops?Capped wrote:Fly,fly!! If I ever try batch sparging again and it results in the same fiasco as previous attempts,I swear I'll throw the MT,grains and all,out the freakin window. My main prroblem is finding it impossible to get a clear run-off,even if I recirculate 20 times (been there,done that etc). With fly,it's clear after 2 or 3 litres,then plain sailing from there on in. Nah,batch just ain't for me.
- trucker5774
- Falling off the Barstool
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 12:20 pm
- Location: North Devon
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
As Chris said above, some people try too hard. I had a very smooth brew day yesterday. The batch sparge went like a dream and was as clear as some finished brews I have seen. It was a regular grain bill I use and did everything the same (best as I can tell) The runnings were particularly clear and the theme continued after the boil!
John
Drinking/Already drunk........ Trucker's Anti-Freeze (Turbo Cider), Truckers Delight, Night Trucker, Rose wine, Truckers Hitch, Truckers Revenge, Trucker's Lay-by, Trucker's Trailer, Flower Truck, Trucker's Gearshift, Trucker's Horn, Truck Crash, Fixby Gold!
Conditioning... Doing what? Get it down your neck! ........
FV 1............
FV 2............
FV 3............
Next Brews..... Trucker's Jack Knife
Drinking/Already drunk........ Trucker's Anti-Freeze (Turbo Cider), Truckers Delight, Night Trucker, Rose wine, Truckers Hitch, Truckers Revenge, Trucker's Lay-by, Trucker's Trailer, Flower Truck, Trucker's Gearshift, Trucker's Horn, Truck Crash, Fixby Gold!
Conditioning... Doing what? Get it down your neck! ........
FV 1............
FV 2............
FV 3............
Next Brews..... Trucker's Jack Knife
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Hmmm Ive been wondering about something to do with this for a while.
We all (well most) crash cool the wort in the boiler to coagulate proteins well it seems to me that even if you get a crystal clear run off from the MT there will still be soluable proteins 'hiding' in the wort.
I wonder if anyone has ever crash cooled the wort BEFORE the boil.......hmmm
We all (well most) crash cool the wort in the boiler to coagulate proteins well it seems to me that even if you get a crystal clear run off from the MT there will still be soluable proteins 'hiding' in the wort.
I wonder if anyone has ever crash cooled the wort BEFORE the boil.......hmmm
- trucker5774
- Falling off the Barstool
- Posts: 3193
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 12:20 pm
- Location: North Devon
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
I have .........but only a glass full in the fridge to observe the clarity. It did clear with sediment at the bottom (well that's where it would be) Don't know if it would be desirable to do the whole amount. It would certainly use more energy to boil it again. I'm not a chemist so can't add much morecrookedeyeboy wrote:Hmmm Ive been wondering about something to do with this for a while.
We all (well most) crash cool the wort in the boiler to coagulate proteins well it seems to me that even if you get a crystal clear run off from the MT there will still be soluable proteins 'hiding' in the wort.
I wonder if anyone has ever crash cooled the wort BEFORE the boil.......hmmm
John
Drinking/Already drunk........ Trucker's Anti-Freeze (Turbo Cider), Truckers Delight, Night Trucker, Rose wine, Truckers Hitch, Truckers Revenge, Trucker's Lay-by, Trucker's Trailer, Flower Truck, Trucker's Gearshift, Trucker's Horn, Truck Crash, Fixby Gold!
Conditioning... Doing what? Get it down your neck! ........
FV 1............
FV 2............
FV 3............
Next Brews..... Trucker's Jack Knife
Drinking/Already drunk........ Trucker's Anti-Freeze (Turbo Cider), Truckers Delight, Night Trucker, Rose wine, Truckers Hitch, Truckers Revenge, Trucker's Lay-by, Trucker's Trailer, Flower Truck, Trucker's Gearshift, Trucker's Horn, Truck Crash, Fixby Gold!
Conditioning... Doing what? Get it down your neck! ........
FV 1............
FV 2............
FV 3............
Next Brews..... Trucker's Jack Knife
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
I suppose the fridge would be ok and yes I think the PIA bit would be that the wort would take aggggeeeeessss to get boiling but I was thinking about crash cooling which coagulates more protein rather than just putting it in the fridge where it will just slowly cool.
Silly question time. BUT. What is the point of holding the wort at say 66C whilst recirculating with a HERMS or RIMS. Is it just so that it doesnt start to cool and take longer to boil? Cant be that as that seems to simple and loads of effort electronics wise just to keep it at a steady temp.
Ta in advance
Silly question time. BUT. What is the point of holding the wort at say 66C whilst recirculating with a HERMS or RIMS. Is it just so that it doesnt start to cool and take longer to boil? Cant be that as that seems to simple and loads of effort electronics wise just to keep it at a steady temp.
Ta in advance
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
With a HERMS/RIMS setup you recirculate for the duration of the mash not just at the end.
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Daft but you get crystal clear wort from the tun
Then again most who use the system don't cite higher quality beer as the reason for all the gizmos
Then again most who use the system don't cite higher quality beer as the reason for all the gizmos
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Haha great replies! Lets be honest we all love a gadget! I know I do, ive already got a pump and im looking at one of those lovely little £26 ones Leewink found.
Dont need it but must have it.
While Im at it I shall make both a HERMS and a RIMS along with a robot that will massage my aching limbs after a long day brewing!
Dont need it but must have it.
While Im at it I shall make both a HERMS and a RIMS along with a robot that will massage my aching limbs after a long day brewing!
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Ha nail on head there
To me clear is free of cloud and transparent. Turbid is thick with suspended matter.Capped wrote:I dunno tbh! All I know is that I'd much rather see a clear run-off than a turbid one . It's only natural,innit?? If anyone can convince me that a clear one is in no way superior to a cloudy one,I may well reconsider!Scooby wrote:Why the obsession with clear run off?
I don't think anyone has explained how a clear run off from the tun improves the finished beer, or why not having a clear run off is detrimental.
Opaque isn't transparent but clear enough for meChris-x1 wrote:you should try to achieve as clear a run off as practical but it doesn't have to be bright (and it doesn't matter if it is opaque).
-
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:08 am
- Location: Barnsley,SouthYorkshire
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Well after all the hoo-ha on here,I've brewed today and had another go at batch sparging,having been a little reassured that a clear run-off wasn't the be all and end all. As expected I didn't get anything approaching clarity at any stage,but..... I used 4500g pale,200g crystal,35g Choc malt and ended up with 23ltrs@ 1060 OG! This is astonishing for me - gonna have to dilute that baby - don't know what's gone right or wrong here?! See how it pans out anyway,but I do have reservations about the lack of clarity at this stage. Oh,and I gotta admit that the whole process was a lot less hassle and a sight quicker than fly-sparging. A convert? Watch this space!
-
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:08 am
- Location: Barnsley,SouthYorkshire
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
Do I win a prize ? I'm as shocked as you - was aiming for 1050ish,which is what I'd have got by fly sparging. In the event,I didn't want to faff around with two FVs so I 'lost' the best part of a gallon down the sink and replaced it with water. Voila - 1050!
Re: Fly or batch sparge?
no prize capped,but you can pat yourself on the back so i take it that fly sparging improves efficeincy,not that im too bothered about it,i always batch sparge and base my brew on 70%@ about 1046,and if i get 1042 im happy with that.the most important thing to me is im producing great beers which everyone enjoys..