I can see a lot of sense in what you say, but I have made some fine ale this way. The way I see it is if my boiler has hops in it that haven’t been boiled and my 2nd brew is not a hop dependant beer, then what’s wrong with leaving them in. I agree it could be a risk, but I have done this quite a few times now without any problem.Barley Water wrote:Well God knows I can be as frugal as the next person but I would think reusing hops might actually cost you money in the long run. To the extent that alot of the alpha and beta acids are pulled out of the hops during the first use, that would leave an undetermined minor amount for the second brew. Since you don't really know what you are dealing with I would think the risk of having less than an optimum beer would go way up for the second brew. To the extent you made an investment in grain etc for the second brew why chance less than a sublime beer? Sure, it's probably going to be potable but hey, aren't we trying to make the best swill we can possible produce? After all, you can get all the second rate stuff you can lay your hands on easily, that's what Bud, Miller and Coors are for after all.
If anything it makes me less concerned about putting lots of late hops in my 1st brew, knowing that they won’t go to waste. My 2nd brew is always only a simple bitter or stout.
Theres probably lots of reasons not to do this. I thought, theres one way to find out what happens if you do. So I tried it, I like it, So I continue to do it when i do a double brewday. For me the 2nd brew has been a gorgeous unexpected bonus.