Hop Growing 2013

If you have a hop related question about International Bittering Units or alpha acid, post it here!
Post Reply
User avatar
seymour
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6390
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by seymour » Fri Apr 26, 2013 6:39 pm

I agree, but it's not. Scientists on a wild hops collecting trip collected hops from it. Check out the link.

crafty john

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by crafty john » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:38 pm

seymour wrote:I agree, but it's not. Scientists on a wild hops collecting trip collected hops from it. Check out the link.
Gooseberry hops :?:

pofke

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by pofke » Fri Apr 26, 2013 7:57 pm

One thing to note is that the accession is not available anymore, so it suggests that the hop wasn't interesting as a breeding material. Also, from the first photo on the link there is a male hop, then there are two photos of a goooseberry like plant. And the description speaks of "ripe fruit". This could be if germplasm of multiple plants were added to the accession archive from tje same field trip.

boingy

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by boingy » Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:04 pm

Gooseberry beer.

Image

User avatar
seymour
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6390
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by seymour » Fri Apr 26, 2013 8:46 pm

pofke wrote:One thing to note is that the accession is not available anymore, so it suggests that the hop wasn't interesting as a breeding material.
It's true they do not offer the accession. But I know all about that particular trip, and its purpose was to observe disease resistence, and collect seeds for a study on wild North American hops to determine their potential for improving commercial brewing cultivars. None of these accessions were subsequently offered to the public through the website, as that simply wasn't the purpose of this study. I'm not arguing this is worthwhile breeding stock, per se, I'm arguing the natural biodiversity of Humulus lupulus is much broader than most people realize.

You really don't have to believe me, but this is a field of study I am deeply involved in. I don't mean that condescendingly, I know you grow hops too. But I am actively engaged in cross-pollinating native American hops grown from wild-collected seeds to named brewing cultivars. Stay tuned, I may have something exciting to announce in several years. For the record, I grow my plant in a more upright habit on twine, and it has adapted pretty well, especially when I trim it back to a few bines as commercial growers recommend, and it's thornless, though the spikelets are much harder and sharper than typical brewing cultivars. Many of the leaves are three-lobed, though, more like that picture and gooseberry leaves. Don't you see? My point is that it does not always require many, many evolutionary cycles for this plant to adapt in remarkable ways. Back to Cazamodo's question: it's possible if he doesn't trim back the bines, it just might resume a lower, wider, more shrub-like growth habit.
pofke wrote:Also, from the first photo on the link there is a male hop, then there are two photos of a goooseberry like plant. And the description speaks of "ripe fruit". This could be if germplasm of multiple plants were added to the accession archive from the same field trip.
I grant that's theoretically possible, but when they collected plants unrelated to the hops study, they always made a separate entry to the ARS/USDA archive for each, and the relevant photos are logged only beneath each relevant entry. Also, I'm sure you noticed they specifically named all nearby plants in the description:
associated plants: Celtis, Pinus ponderosa, Apocynum, Mahonia ripens pubescent
Celtis is a hackberry tree in the elm family. Pinus ponderosa is a full-size evergreen conifer tree. Apocynum is a milkweed-lookalike also called Indian hemp or dogbane, and Mahonia ripens pubescent is commonly called Oregon grape. That is a comprehensive list compiled by botanists who are experts on identifying Humulus plants, and know how to differentiate it from a Gooseberry plant. As you can see, none of the associated plants remotely resemble gooseberry. This plant is Humulus lupulus.

Lastly, "fruit" is meant in the botanical sense, which is to say any flowers which matured into a fertilized seed cone, such as hops. That's not a smoking gun for gooseberry fruit.
Last edited by seymour on Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pofke

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by pofke » Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:21 pm

Hop leaves are palmate, and can have from one to seven lobes, that is true. But, with all due respect to your selection activities, don't you believe that such a radical change in plant morphology - stems changing from stiff fragile bine to self supporting, changing shape from hexagonal and twisted into somewhat straight and elastic, also developing tougher bark and spines on the same branches and still be regarded as the same species? Is this rapid "change" plausible? Doubt that. This is not a hop plant, period. Maybe it has had a hop growing on it, but nothing more.

User avatar
seymour
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6390
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by seymour » Fri Apr 26, 2013 9:40 pm

To be clear, my particular plant is not from the one pictured. I just wanted to show an extremely rare example of a highly adapted wild form of Humulus lupulus (I've seen others, too, I wish I could find more details from my research.) Mine is a different native American wild hop collected from the wild, and it does have some recognizable similarities to the one pictured which are not in common with brewing cultivars. I agree all the changes you describe cannot occur in a single plant's lifespan, nor even one or two generations, but growth habit in particular is surprisingly adaptable. Do I think they are the same species? Yes, I know they are the same species. But that's okay, we don't have to agree. I'll try to stop hijacking this thread.

Eadweard
Lost in an Alcoholic Haze
Posts: 683
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:17 am
Location: Woking

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by Eadweard » Fri Apr 26, 2013 10:16 pm

I don't want to play the gooseberry but if I can butt in on this thread my Mathon has now emerged, though as it's in Surrey I've decided it can now revert to being a Farnham Whitebine:

Image

User avatar
scuppeteer
Under the Table
Posts: 1512
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:32 pm
Location: Brenchley, Kent (Birthplace of Fuggles... or is it?)

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by scuppeteer » Sat Apr 27, 2013 9:36 am

Eadweard wrote:I don't want to play the gooseberry but if I can butt in on this thread my Mathon has now emerged, though as it's in Surrey I've decided it can now revert to being a Farnham Whitebine:
NAH! Anyone can see that's a Canterbury Whitebine! Or is it a strawberry? :lol:
Dave Berry


Can't be arsed to keep changing this bit, so, drinking some beer and wanting to brew many more!

Sir, you are drunk! Yes madam, and you are ugly, but in the morning I shall be sober! - WSC

User avatar
DC
Lost in an Alcoholic Haze
Posts: 709
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 10:52 pm
Location: Newcastle

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by DC » Sun May 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Hi all, Just thought I would post up a few pics of my hops which have taken off quite a bit over the last week. Bought some 1.5m canes from Morrisons x 10 for £2

Cascades are going great guns (best out of the 3 varieties I have)

Image

Challenger (in 2nd place)

Image

Fuggles (lagging behind in 3rd place)

Image

Cheers DC
FV No 1: Nowt
FV No 2: Nowt
FV No 3: Nowt
FV No 4: Nowt
Pressure Barrel No 1: Nowt
Conditioning: Nowt
Drinking: Nowt
Planning:
Yeast Bank: SafAle S04, Youngs Cider Yeast.
Image

User avatar
seymour
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6390
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
Contact:

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by seymour » Sun May 05, 2013 6:49 pm

DC wrote:...Cascades are going great guns (best out of the 3 varieties I have)

Image
Lookin' good, DC. Those Cascades bines seem much redder than I remember seeing before. Is that typical of Cascades grown in the UK?

gnutz2

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by gnutz2 » Sun May 05, 2013 7:25 pm

EKG going nuts as usual, gonna try 6 bines instead of 3 this year, hopefully it'll knock a bit off the height it gets to.

Image

User avatar
barneey
Telling imaginary friend stories
Posts: 5423
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2011 10:42 pm
Location: East Kent

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by barneey » Sun May 05, 2013 7:29 pm

Baz it looks near enough the same as the photo from last year, did you just leave in the ground + did you get many hops last year? Gotta say it looks a healthy look plant

Cheers

C
Hair of the dog, bacon, butty.
Hops, cider pips & hello.

Name the Movie + song :)

Eadweard
Lost in an Alcoholic Haze
Posts: 683
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 12:17 am
Location: Woking

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by Eadweard » Sun May 05, 2013 8:11 pm

gnutz2 wrote:EKG going nuts as usual, gonna try 6 bines instead of 3 this year, hopefully it'll knock a bit off the height it gets to.

Image
Those bines look very red for EKG

gnutz2

Re: Hop Growing 2013

Post by gnutz2 » Sun May 05, 2013 8:42 pm

barneey wrote:Baz it looks near enough the same as the photo from last year, did you just leave in the ground + did you get many hops last year? Gotta say it looks a healthy look plant

Cheers

C
I got a sh!t load of hops from it last year, from records I harvested 2.13kg of wet hops and this gave me 390g of dry hops.

It's permenantely planted in the ground Clive, on its 3rd year now.
Eadweard wrote:
Those bines look very red for EKG
All I know is I bought it online is an EKG, the beer I made last year tasted good anyway.

Post Reply