I can't wait to try out your methods

I think I favour your method over mine, and I'll try it next time. I see some benefits:Cazamodo wrote:Hi guys, read through this thread and found it very helpfull.
I started just cooling my brews to stop the fermentation, but I now use a different method. Its not as easy as just cooling them, but it is easier for me since I dont have a brew fridge, and brew many bottle of cider at a time!
Heres a link. http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f32/easy-st ... cs-193295/
Laripu,Laripu wrote:I think I favour your method over mine, and I'll try it next time. I see some benefits:Cazamodo wrote:Hi guys, read through this thread and found it very helpfull.
I started just cooling my brews to stop the fermentation, but I now use a different method. Its not as easy as just cooling them, but it is easier for me since I dont have a brew fridge, and brew many bottle of cider at a time!
Heres a link. http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f32/easy-st ... cs-193295/
1. While it appears to be slower (because you do fewer bottles at a time) it probably isn't, because they stay in the water for less time. There is more involvement, but it's a hobby so that's a good thing.![]()
2. It seems to be much more reliable because hot water transfers heat more efficiently than air in an oven, even with convection going.
3. If there is an explosion or any kind of accident, it's in a covered pot, not in your oven where it can make a mess.
Yes, indeed, I prefer your method and will use it next time. (For the moment, I still have about 30 half-litre Grolsch flip-top bottles in the fridge - and we don't drink it often.)
No, I never did. We took so long to finish that batch of cider that I never made it again.6470zzy wrote:Laripu,Laripu wrote:I think I favour your method over mine, and I'll try it next time. I see some benefits:Cazamodo wrote:Hi guys, read through this thread and found it very helpfull.
I started just cooling my brews to stop the fermentation, but I now use a different method. Its not as easy as just cooling them, but it is easier for me since I dont have a brew fridge, and brew many bottle of cider at a time!
Heres a link. http://www.homebrewtalk.com/f32/easy-st ... cs-193295/
1. While it appears to be slower (because you do fewer bottles at a time) it probably isn't, because they stay in the water for less time. There is more involvement, but it's a hobby so that's a good thing.![]()
2. It seems to be much more reliable because hot water transfers heat more efficiently than air in an oven, even with convection going.
3. If there is an explosion or any kind of accident, it's in a covered pot, not in your oven where it can make a mess.
Yes, indeed, I prefer your method and will use it next time. (For the moment, I still have about 30 half-litre Grolsch flip-top bottles in the fridge - and we don't drink it often.)
Did you ever end up giving this sweetening method a try? I see that apple juice is on sale this week so I'm thinking of making some TC.
Cheers
What yeast are you using? I am in search for one that will leave more of the apple scent intact.CestrIan wrote:Thanks for bringing this thread back to life. I've been sweetening my TC with maltodextrin and sweetex and it's just not quite right. The immersion pasteurising method sounds great. I'm gonna give this a go soon.
CestrIan wrote:I've used us05 in the past as I always have some left over from the last PA but it left subtle ale flavours. Not bad, but not great! The last few brews Ive used champagne yeast, but when I've crash cooled and then left in bulk at cold temp for a week like I do with my ales it has taken too much yeast out of the cider and they haven't bottle conditioned very well, or it's taken ages anyway. This time I'm using young's cider yeast, so we'll see how that goes. I didn't lose any apple aroma or flavour with the champagne yeast though, but I don't add much sugar, just grape juice as I want it about 4.5-5.0%ABV anyway.