Short mash times
- bitter_dave
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Whitley Bay
Short mash times
What are people’s views on short mash times of, say, half an hour?
I’ve mashed for 50 mins with Maris Otter and it turned out good (this was for a mild containing 2.5 kg of pale, around 900 gms of Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate + some DME in the boil).
What would it be like if I mashed 3kg of Mild Ale malt, with 500 gm of dark Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate malt for 30 mins? Any thoughts? Was going to use Windsor ale yeast so was thinking of not going crazy with the mash temp.
I’m keen to save time where I can. I’ve cut the boil time to half an hour and compensated with more hops and this seems to be fine. Was wondering about the mash. I think I’ve heard people say half an hour is fine. What do you think?
I’ve mashed for 50 mins with Maris Otter and it turned out good (this was for a mild containing 2.5 kg of pale, around 900 gms of Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate + some DME in the boil).
What would it be like if I mashed 3kg of Mild Ale malt, with 500 gm of dark Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate malt for 30 mins? Any thoughts? Was going to use Windsor ale yeast so was thinking of not going crazy with the mash temp.
I’m keen to save time where I can. I’ve cut the boil time to half an hour and compensated with more hops and this seems to be fine. Was wondering about the mash. I think I’ve heard people say half an hour is fine. What do you think?
Re: Short mash times
If time is so important you could always try using kits.bitter_dave wrote: ↑Wed Jun 03, 2020 10:41 pmWhat are people’s views on short mash times of, say, half an hour?
I’ve mashed for 50 mins with Maris Otter and it turned out good (this was for a mild containing 2.5 kg of pale, around 900 gms of Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate + some DME in the boil).
What would it be like if I mashed 3kg of Mild Ale malt, with 500 gm of dark Crystal and 100 gm of chocolate malt for 30 mins? Any thoughts? Was going to use Windsor ale yeast so was thinking of not going crazy with the mash temp.
I’m keen to save time where I can. I’ve cut the boil time to half an hour and compensated with more hops and this seems to be fine. Was wondering about the mash. I think I’ve heard people say half an hour is fine. What do you think?
"You're not drunk if you can lie on the floor without holding on." Dean Martin
1. Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, thoroughly used, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming... "f*ck, what a trip
It's better to lose time with friends than to lose friends with time (Portuguese proverb)
Alone we travel faster
Together we travel further
( In an admonishing email from our golf club)
1. Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, thoroughly used, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming... "f*ck, what a trip
It's better to lose time with friends than to lose friends with time (Portuguese proverb)
Alone we travel faster
Together we travel further
( In an admonishing email from our golf club)
Re: Short mash times
Or if it is time during the day that is at a premium, an overnight mash could be the answer. I've never done that myself.
After selling my shiny kit, I'm back to really short BIAB brew days and a big saving in brew time using a no-chill cube.
I brew therefore I ... I .... forget
- orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7197
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Re: Short mash times
Are bigger batches an option? Seems a shame to compromise.
I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
Re: Short mash times
Try it and report back.
I know that some commercial breweries only mash for 45 minutes, some less than that.
I believe the argument is that modern malts are highly modified and most of the conversion happens within the first 20 minutes or so.
So mash for 30 minutes and see what difference it makes.
It may reduce your efficiency, but you need to work out how much difference it makes for yourself.
And google gave me this: http://brulosophy.com/2014/09/01/does-m ... t-results/
I know that some commercial breweries only mash for 45 minutes, some less than that.
I believe the argument is that modern malts are highly modified and most of the conversion happens within the first 20 minutes or so.
So mash for 30 minutes and see what difference it makes.
It may reduce your efficiency, but you need to work out how much difference it makes for yourself.
And google gave me this: http://brulosophy.com/2014/09/01/does-m ... t-results/
Fermenting: nowt
Conditioning: English IPA/Bretted English IPA
Drinking: Sunshine Marmalade, Festbier, Helles Bock, Smokey lagery beer, Irish Export StoutCascade APA (homegrown hops), Orval clone, Impy stout, Duvel clone, Conestoga (American Barley wine)
Planning: Dark Mild, Kozel dark (ish), Simmonds Bitter, Bitter, Citra PA and more!
Conditioning: English IPA/Bretted English IPA
Drinking: Sunshine Marmalade, Festbier, Helles Bock, Smokey lagery beer, Irish Export StoutCascade APA (homegrown hops), Orval clone, Impy stout, Duvel clone, Conestoga (American Barley wine)
Planning: Dark Mild, Kozel dark (ish), Simmonds Bitter, Bitter, Citra PA and more!
- Meatymc
- Drunk as a Skunk
- Posts: 836
- Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 8:36 pm
- Location: Northallerton, North Yorkshire
Re: Short mash times
For no accountable reason, I always mash for 90 minutes - irrespective of what I'm brewing although I'm mainly an IPA brewer. Is the consensus re' modern malts that this isn't necessary?
Re: Short mash times
60 minutes for me, sometimes up to 90 if I'm otherwise busy. There are people out there experimenting with 20 minutes.
I brew therefore I ... I .... forget
- bitter_dave
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Whitley Bay
Re: Short mash times
Thanks for your thoughts folks.
I found this in the book 'Simple Homebrewing' on pages 74-76 (you can view this online):
https://bit.ly/2U9z1Fa
I found this in the book 'Simple Homebrewing' on pages 74-76 (you can view this online):
https://bit.ly/2U9z1Fa
- Dennis King
- Telling everyone Your My Best Mate
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:52 pm
- Location: Pitsea Essex
Re: Short mash times
Back in the day it was advised to do an iodine check to make sure conversion was complete, personally I've not done this for over 20 years. If you can stll buy the stuff may be worth trying.
- bitter_dave
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Whitley Bay
Re: Short mash times
Thanks Dennis - good tip!Dennis King wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 3:44 pmBack in the day it was advised to do an iodine check to make sure conversion was complete, personally I've not done this for over 20 years. If you can stll buy the stuff may be worth trying.
- Jocky
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Re: Short mash times
Commercial breweries might only leave the mash for a 45 minute stand, but it can take them a long time to both fill and empty their mash tun (not to mention sparging time) with the enzymes still working all the time, so the idea they are 'only' mashing for 45 minutes is quite misleading.
Also while the bulk of conversion might be done in 20 minutes, there's still enzymatic activity going on that will increase extraction and shorten the long chain sugars for a more fermentable wort. So you might need to adjust the recipe to account for a lower efficiency and lower fermentability.
Also while the bulk of conversion might be done in 20 minutes, there's still enzymatic activity going on that will increase extraction and shorten the long chain sugars for a more fermentable wort. So you might need to adjust the recipe to account for a lower efficiency and lower fermentability.
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.
- bitter_dave
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2043
- Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Whitley Bay
Re: Short mash times
Jocky wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 4:29 pmCommercial breweries might only leave the mash for a 45 minute stand, but it can take them a long time to both fill and empty their mash tun (not to mention sparging time) with the enzymes still working all the time, so the idea they are 'only' mashing for 45 minutes is quite misleading.
Also while the bulk of conversion might be done in 20 minutes, there's still enzymatic activity going on that will increase extraction and shorten the long chain sugars for a more fermentable wort. So you might need to adjust the recipe to account for a lower efficiency and lower fermentability.
That's interesting - thanks Jocky. If short mash time reduces fermentability presumably you would want to consider your yeast choice as well? Windsor is going to have relatively low attenuation at the best of times. S04 might be a better bet?
- Jocky
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Re: Short mash times
You’d have to try it and see. SO4 might not have the character you want. The difference in attenuation mighty only be a few points, but I guess every bit counts with Windsor.
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.
- Eric
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2873
- Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 1:18 am
- Location: Sunderland.
Re: Short mash times
If one presupposes that saccharification is the only process in the mash tun, then it is reasonable to assume 60 minutes will be adequate for most simple recipes.
Brewing with low calcium level has the potential of limiting beta amylase activity to less than the optimal period, so those brewers might readily assume there is no advantage to mashing for a longer period.
A high temperature mash can achieve close to total conversion in around 10 minutes. Getting the wort to ferment is then the problem.
Brewing with low calcium level has the potential of limiting beta amylase activity to less than the optimal period, so those brewers might readily assume there is no advantage to mashing for a longer period.
A high temperature mash can achieve close to total conversion in around 10 minutes. Getting the wort to ferment is then the problem.
Without patience, life becomes difficult and the sooner it's finished, the better.
-
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 387
- Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2017 11:03 pm
- Location: Derbyshire, UK
Re: Short mash times
As per the PeeBee advice in "Alcohol free (i.e. low ABV) beer thread" I have tried several experimental low ABV brews (about 5 now) 30 min mashes at 74 degrees, most recent 2kg Munich, 300gm Crystal and 200gm Malted oats for 27 litres into FV. 88% mash efficiency in 26 litres mash water (from GF calculator). 0.9% ABV with S-33 bottled at day 4.Eric wrote: ↑Thu Jun 04, 2020 10:02 pmIf one presupposes that saccharification is the only process in the mash tun, then it is reasonable to assume 60 minutes will be adequate for most simple recipes.
Brewing with low calcium level has the potential of limiting beta amylase activity to less than the optimal period, so those brewers might readily assume there is no advantage to mashing for a longer period.
A high temperature mash can achieve close to total conversion in around 10 minutes. Getting the wort to ferment is then the problem.
I know that is idiosyncratic and atypical of a standard brew, but thought figures may be useful especially if you're aiming for a lowish ABV beer? My limited experience suggests I get lowest efficiencies with my largest grainbills.