Sugar

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
Post Reply
BarrowBoy

Sugar

Post by BarrowBoy » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:36 pm

Hi Folks (first post from me),

I've done about 4 all-grain brews (some better than others but reading this forum and 18,000ft.com I think I know where some of the mistakes have been made) and all recipes have come from Dave Line's book 'Brewing Beers Like Those You Buy'.

I notice that quite a few recipes on here (Jim's standard for example) don't call for the addition of sugar whereas all Dave Line's recipes add it in some form.

Does a good mash produce enough fermentable sugars from the malt alone?

steve_flack

Post by steve_flack » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:39 pm

There's plenty of beers both commercial and homebrewed that get all their fermentable sugars from the mash alone. There are two reasons to add sugar to a beer. One is to dry out a beer as sugar ferments completely making a beer less sweet - useful for strong beers. The other reason is cheapness. Malt costs more than sugar.

Dave Line's book is fairly old and the range of grains available now is much better than when the book was written. Also Dave was trying to emulate commercial beers and many of those use a small amount of sugar (see reason two).

Scooby

Post by Scooby » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:48 pm

Yes, but you know what they say about cracking eggs :!:

Many people over the years have used DL,s recipe's with great success and DL didn't earn the reputation he has by formulating crap recipes :!:

Various sugars can add their own flavours add as long as they don't contribute more than about 10% of the fermentable sugar are fine to use :wink:

Having said that many believe that all grain means just that.

Of course what Steve says is correct, reason 3 IMO is the flovour unrefined sugar such as muscovado or molasses impart.

steve_flack

Post by steve_flack » Thu Mar 22, 2007 4:56 pm

Scooby wrote: Many people over the years have used DL,s recipe's with great success and DL didn't earn the reputation he has by formulating crap recipes :!:
Did I say they were crap or in any way impeach his reputation? No

They are fine recipes especially considering the basic range of malts he had to work with.

I'm just saying that if he'd had the ingredients we have available today he would perhaps have done things differently.

Scooby

Post by Scooby » Thu Mar 22, 2007 5:10 pm

steve_flack wrote:
Scooby wrote: Many people over the years have used DL,s recipe's with great success and DL didn't earn the reputation he has by formulating crap recipes :!:
Did I say they were crap or in any way impeach his reputation? No

They are fine recipes especially considering the basic range of malts he had to work with.

I'm just saying that if he'd had the ingredients we have available today he would perhaps have done things differently.
Steve I didn't see you post when I wrote mine! you just beat me to it. I added an edit with reference to you when I saw you post :wink:

BTW In Wheeler's BYOBRAAH nearly 50% of the recipes include white sugar. mine is the 1998 version so quite up up to date.

Post Reply