Souring for the 'tang'

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
Niall K

Souring for the 'tang'

Post by Niall K » Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:28 am

I have noticed a fair few recipes for Guinness Draught clone requires the souring of about 2 bottles of stout, by leaving it in a bowl for about 1 week and then freezing it. While brewing, you thaw the sour stout and heat it to 82 - 90 Deg C for 20 minutes. At the end of the wort boil you add the sour stout. Has anybody tried this and does it work to replicate a close Guinness Draught Clone?

Niall

eskimobob

Post by eskimobob » Mon Sep 03, 2007 9:21 am

Nah - too much faffing for me - besides, I am quite happy with my EB Stout taste.

I have heard of simpler methods where you just pour a couple of bottles into a jug and leave at room temp to stand for a couple of days but never tried it.

oblivious

Post by oblivious » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:34 am

what about adding some acid malt

oblivious

Post by oblivious » Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:55 am

DaaB wrote:
oblivious wrote:what about adding some acid malt
or lactic acid?
Same thing i think

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Mon Sep 03, 2007 12:45 pm

Actually I would think that plain old vinegar would be the better option.

Having been in the situation of having a 'house' infection there is no way you want to think about allowing any deliberate infection anyway near your brewery.

oblivious

Post by oblivious » Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:21 pm

Acetic acid is quite pungent aroma and not the acid associated with positive sourness in beer

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Mon Sep 03, 2007 1:39 pm

It does depend on what quantity you are talking about, as the sourness that is 'traditionally' associated with stouts comes from acetobacter, not lactobacter

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:08 pm

DaaB wrote:Wasn't someone on the Digest saying that vinegar can infect beer as it hasn't been pasturised or something along those lines ?
I recall something along those lines as well, which is probably why I'd be using something like Distilled vinegar.

Quantities should be around 5ml / gallon IIRC, although I'd do a taste trial with a much smaller sample gradually building it up to find what level it becomes objectionable at. And don't forget to compare it with an un soured beer as you go along :)

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Mon Sep 03, 2007 3:41 pm

Hmmm, Interesting,

There is always pastuerisation, with a dilute solution.

And the other thing to remember is that Acetobacter requires Oxygen, in a keg/bottle situation it is unlikely to be able to reproduce. So even if there was a bacterial count, and it was viable, its not likely to get any worse. Especially with the volumes that we are talking about

Just keep anything that come into contact with the sour beer, for sour beer.

mysterio

Post by mysterio » Mon Sep 03, 2007 5:13 pm

I would just brew a good stout recipe and see how you like it. If you want a 'tang' add the lactic afterwards.

delboy

Post by delboy » Mon Sep 03, 2007 8:18 pm

DaaB wrote:
DaaB wrote:Wasn't someone on the Digest saying that vinegar can infect beer as it hasn't been pasturised or something along those lines ?
Found it...
BillV wrote:"Distilled" white vinegar means the vinegar is concentrated (see the
definition of 'distilled'). It does NOT mean that the vinegar passed
through a reflux still. "Distilled vinegar" may include viable
aceobacteria. treat it accordingly.
Maybe even distilled vinegar isn't such a good idea (assuming BillV's post is correct).
Distilled vinegar is made from distilled alcohol which is then diluted and fermented with acetobacter iirc.
AFAIK vinegars like sarsons etc are pasteurised and then put into hot sterile bottles otherwise it can from a kind of slime know as mother see piccy below.

Image

David Edge

Post by David Edge » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:29 am

Back to the question, does anyone perceive an acetic tang in draught Guinness these days? A trip to Dublin found various samples of rather bland quality. A trip to a brewing club meeting in Tamworth found half a dozen people who can brew a better dry stout than the heirs of Arthur Guinness.

I'd suggest honing your technique until you can make a stout to die for. You can then start pondering souring and the easiest way of doing that is to get a pipette and and small amounts of vinegar and lactic acid to the glass.

Easy and cheap, no risk of infection and you'll quickly find out what you like.

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:31 am

Well Said David =D>

I was wondering if you would chip in on this one

David Edge

Post by David Edge » Tue Sep 04, 2007 8:38 am

Unmasked! I was racking my brains over the identity of a TJB who would have been at the pH meter meeting! Tony Badger of Durden Park seemed unlikely.

delboy

Post by delboy » Tue Sep 04, 2007 9:21 am

David Edge wrote:Back to the question, does anyone perceive an acetic tang in draught Guinness these days? A trip to Dublin found various samples of rather bland quality. A trip to a brewing club meeting in Tamworth found half a dozen people who can brew a better dry stout than the heirs of Arthur Guinness.

I'd suggest honing your technique until you can make a stout to die for. You can then start pondering souring and the easiest way of doing that is to get a pipette and and small amounts of vinegar and lactic acid to the glass.

Easy and cheap, no risk of infection and you'll quickly find out what you like.
Thats a good description of guinness its bland all right and for my palate it tastes the same in belfast, dublin, the continent, the states, BLAND.

I feel sorry for people who come to dublin thinking they are at the 'mecca' of draught guiness and are expecting this fantastic pint, they won't get it (unless they are deluding themselves).
It'd be like going to st louis (or where ever the main Anheuser-Busch factory is) and expecting to get a sublime pint of bud :lol:

Back to the souring, a few months ago after reading the section in grahams book about stouts and porters, i experimented just as David suggests using a small syringe to measure the additions.

The results are in and for my palate at least additions of vinegar to a stout produce something that i really don't want to drink.

Post Reply