Confused by first wort hopping
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Here’s a copy of the original FWH technical report, published 20 years ago. As can be seen, it involved a lot more than subjective sensory analysis. Whether or not someone can perceive it is more to do with their unique biology. FWH has an effect on the biochemistry of beer. I happen to be one of the people who thinks he can notice a pleasant difference in FWHd beers. I’m not saying my sense of taste is any better or worse than anyone else’s. Just that it’s wired up to my brain. I’m pretty confident about this too. Every beer I brewed last year was FWHd. This included some of my favourite recipes that I’ve been brewing for years. As far as I’m concerned, it took my beers to the next level by imparting a finer quality.
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
I'm glad I'm not the only oneMcMullan wrote:Every time I read ‘brulosophy’ on a home brew forum, I sigh and mutter a string of expletives.
There are some (Well One actually - The Lagering one) that I can look at the method, and say yeah I can see why that would work, and that is worth trying, but the vast majority that dispute centuries of brewing techniques . . . I go . . . Nah.
What you have got to remember in the centuries of brewing you can pretty much guarantee that any variation in brewing technique has been tried before, it didn't yield a better result in the long run and was subsequently discarded.
Another proponent of FWH here, don't know how or why it works, but it does AFAIAC. Superb for Lagers and Wheat beers, and I would bet 'balanced' single hop beers as well.
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Hi Aleman
I have a couple of clarification questions ...
Thanks in advance
Cheers, PhilB
I have a couple of clarification questions ...
... did you just overlook The Fining with Gelatine One there? ... or are you suggesting that when I bought that "packet of powered pig products" that it was just "snake-oil" ... it seems to work for me, but there could be some "placebo" type effect, I supposeAleman wrote:There are some (Well One actually - The Lagering one) that I can look at the method, and say yeah I can see why that would work ...
... that's interesting, it seems that the "improved hop flavour and aroma" that this technique suggests, leads people to use it (all too often perhaps) in very hop forward beers (i.e. those with the (proverbial) $hit-load of late hops already in the recipe) ... I wonder whether that may well be the "flaw" in the "brulosopher's exbeeriment" (sic), where his approach to FWH simply seems to be to put the bittering hops into the kettle a bit earlier, with the first runnings ... would you advocate moving late addition hops to FWH instead, like the paper that McMullan linked to suggested, instead? Perhaps you could share a suggested pair ("without and with FWH") of lager/wheat-beer hopping schedules, that you may use, to illustrate?Aleman wrote:Another proponent of FWH here ... Superb for Lagers and Wheat beers, and I would bet 'balanced' single hop beers as well.
Thanks in advance
Cheers, PhilB
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
fwh isn't a new technique, its been used by british brewers for hundreds of years. in the higsons brew logs ive seen from the 1800's the did this extensively in fact the higsons recipe calls for nearly half the hop bill to be fwh
I was very sceptical at first being an avid fan of "throw tons in at the end" but it does work very well indeed
I was very sceptical at first being an avid fan of "throw tons in at the end" but it does work very well indeed
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Hi PhilPhilB wrote:Hi Aleman
I have a couple of clarification questions ...
... did you just overlook The Fining with Gelatine One there? ... or are you suggesting that when I bought that "packet of powered pig products" that it was just "snake-oil" ... it seems to work for me, but there could be some "placebo" type effect, I supposeAleman wrote:There are some (Well One actually - The Lagering one) that I can look at the method, and say yeah I can see why that would work ...
Didn't realise that there was a gelatine xbeerment . . . then again I'm not all that interested in an 'experiment' that proves something that I've known all along in the 35 years I've been brewing. Gelatine fines beers . . . very well indeed. It was one of the things that was advocated by Dave Line in his books published in the 70's and I've used it ever since (when I don't have access to Decent isinglas finings ) . . . I'll go an have a look though
I'll post a couple of recipes / hopping schedules later
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Hi Aleman
Cheers, PhilB
... that's a relief, I've got so much of the stuff that I'd never get to use in anything else ...Aleman wrote:Gelatine fines beers . . . very well indeed
... much appreciated ... my personal take on the "confusion" around this technique, is that (like whirlpooling/post-boil steeping) many people are doing very different things, but talking as if there is ONLY ONE way of doing itAleman wrote:I'll post a couple of recipes / hopping schedules later
Cheers, PhilB
-
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2626
- Joined: Mon Mar 22, 2010 7:10 pm
- Location: Christchurch, Dorset
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Having read through this thread, I'm fancying a FWH Motueka for tomorrow.
It'll be about 1.050, pale malt (86%), Munich malt (9%), pale crystal malt (4%) and flaked oats for the remaining 1%.
The plan is a 90 minute boil, with Motueka FWH 40g, another 20g after 60 minutes and another 20g after the wort's been cooled to 80C.
Or should all the hops be added as first wort hops?
Yeast will be Whitelabs 001.
All thoughts gratefully received.
Guy
It'll be about 1.050, pale malt (86%), Munich malt (9%), pale crystal malt (4%) and flaked oats for the remaining 1%.
The plan is a 90 minute boil, with Motueka FWH 40g, another 20g after 60 minutes and another 20g after the wort's been cooled to 80C.
Or should all the hops be added as first wort hops?
Yeast will be Whitelabs 001.
All thoughts gratefully received.
Guy
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Could do it that way. . .Traditional FWH would have the 20g in as FWH and the 40 in at 90 minutes . . . Leaving the steep hops as is . . . Although again some would say all the late hops should go in as FWH. I don't do that personally.
- Dennis King
- Telling everyone Your My Best Mate
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:52 pm
- Location: Pitsea Essex
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
I have always FWH but not necessarily by design. As I started brewing long before the internet I learnt from books and in the late 70's they were fairly basic so I don't recall reading when to add hops. So as a matter of routine I weighed and added the hops at the start of the sparge. Never found any reason to change.
-
- Falling off the Barstool
- Posts: 3899
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:07 pm
- Location: South Wales UK.
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Bloody Hell Mun!Dennis King wrote: As I started brewing long before the internet I learnt from books and in the late 70's
I left school in the 70`s!
You must be as old as Yoda!
Dennis King Master Brewer! The Force is strong with You!
WA
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Hi Aleman
Errmmm ... gentle reminder ...
If it helps, I made a Helles before Xmas (Edel-Helles even, all H.Mittlefruh) ... 86% Lager Malt, 8.5% Munich, 3% Melanoidin, 2.5 Acid Malt, 23 lts to OG:1.046, bittered/hopped to 18 IBU with ... 45g H.Mittelfruh (3.6% AA) full boil and then 10g H.Mittelfruh for the last 5 mins ... if you wanted you could just suggest how you would put the hops into that, as FWH?
Thanks, in advance
Cheers, PhilB
Errmmm ... gentle reminder ...
...Aleman wrote:I'll post a couple of recipes / hopping schedules later
If it helps, I made a Helles before Xmas (Edel-Helles even, all H.Mittlefruh) ... 86% Lager Malt, 8.5% Munich, 3% Melanoidin, 2.5 Acid Malt, 23 lts to OG:1.046, bittered/hopped to 18 IBU with ... 45g H.Mittelfruh (3.6% AA) full boil and then 10g H.Mittelfruh for the last 5 mins ... if you wanted you could just suggest how you would put the hops into that, as FWH?
Thanks, in advance
Cheers, PhilB
- Aleman
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6132
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
- Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
PhilB wrote:Hi Aleman
Errmmm ... gentle reminder ......Aleman wrote:I'll post a couple of recipes / hopping schedules later
If it helps, I made a Helles before Xmas (Edel-Helles even, all H.Mittlefruh) ... 86% Lager Malt, 8.5% Munich, 3% Melanoidin, 2.5 Acid Malt, 23 lts to OG:1.046, bittered/hopped to 18 IBU with ... 45g H.Mittelfruh (3.6% AA) full boil and then 10g H.Mittelfruh for the last 5 mins ... if you wanted you could just suggest how you would put the hops into that, as FWH?
I would probably go with all the bittering addition as FWH, and keep the late addition as it is (Or In my case an 70- 80C steep)
- alix101
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:34 am
- Location: Chester-le-street Durham
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
"Everybody should belive in something : and I belive I'll have another drink".
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Hi Aleman
Thanks for revisiting this ...
Cheers, PhilB
Thanks for revisiting this ...
... but I wasn't expecting that, as it's in stark contrast to the approach used in that paper McMullen linked to above ... hey-ho, I guess more reading and experimenting for myself is called forAleman wrote:I would probably go with all the bittering addition as FWH, and keep the late addition as it is (Or In my case an 70- 80C steep)
Cheers, PhilB
-
- Falling off the Barstool
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:30 pm
- Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Re: Confused by first wort hopping
Try it both ways and tell us what you find.PhilB wrote:Hi Aleman
Thanks for revisiting this ...... but I wasn't expecting that, as it's in stark contrast to the approach used in that paper McMullen linked to above ... hey-ho, I guess more reading and experimenting for myself is called forAleman wrote:I would probably go with all the bittering addition as FWH, and keep the late addition as it is (Or In my case an 70- 80C steep)
Cheers, PhilB
I'm just here for the beer.