Thanks.jmc wrote:This sounds great...
I left it closed-tight. I wasn't actually trying to capture new "bugs" at this stage, I already had the ones I wanted, I was just letting the grains ripen a little bit, just like making sourdough bread, Malian maafe, Ethiopian injera, etc. Oh, and lest I sound too pompous, it was also a function of my downright laziness, not wanting to clean-up for a couple days. Win-win!jmc wrote:...Sorry about all questions below...
When you let the mash tun 'ripen' was it closed or open to the elements?...
I really don't think so. Nothing that a weak bleach or iodine solution and/or oxygenated cleanser and "good ol' elbow-grease" won't knock-out. I don't even use any heavy-duty chemical cleansers, but I suppose you could. If nothing else, it'll motivate you to scrub extra well afterwards, just in case.jmc wrote:...Would there be any chance of this ripening malt resulting in a permanent 'infection' of wild yeasts / lactobacillus in a cool-box mash tun?...
As usual, I want to encourage homebrewers not to hold-back, not to take things too seriously. I know cleanliness and sanitation are important, especially when introducing non-standard brewer's yeasts to your kit, but here's another valid point: what comes out of your mash/lauter tun gets boiled for 60-90 minutes anyway, right? Believe me, there's nothing growing there which can survive that.
I dunno, it's not an exact science. But, according to my sloppy calculations: 2 lbs of golden brown sugar in a 3 gallon batch would only produce a wort around 1.030, and 1°SRM/2°EBC colour, right? Here's a picture of my resulting beer, which had an OG of 1.048 and coloured around 18°SRM/36°EBC, so the other sugar and colour must've come from somewhere.jmc wrote:...Any idea what % of sugar was from the added 2 lbs golden brown cane sugar?
I assume the cane-sugar formed the majority of the sugars in the brew. With highly fermentable wort mainly simple sugars and a zoo of microorganisms, I'm not suprosed you got 98% attenuation..
