Page 1 of 1

XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 4:38 pm
by Invalid Stout
As I posted elsewhere, I make tiny batches as I don't have a boiler yet, but I do want to do a full wort boil rather than diluting stuff.

For this reason I decided to make a strong stout -- same amount of extract, but less water to heat up on my weedy cooker. Too late for Christmas, obviously, as it will take a good while to mature, but I can always bottle condition it in small bottles and try it next Christmas!

Heat 6L water
Steep 200g chocolate malt at 75 for 30 mins
+1 tbsp fresh ground coffee

Mixed 70g candy sugar with some chocolate malt wort and allowed to melt/bubble.

Added another 2L water and returned all chocolate malt liquor to the pan.
Added 1/4 tsp gypsum
Added 1.4 kg pale LME
Added 10g Northern Brewer - 80min

the original gravity was 1082 :shock:
on the 17th it was down to 1042 and on the 19th 1036. It already tastes pretty good, but will need to finish fermenting and then mellow for a good long time. What gravity should I expect this to reach?

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:38 am
by yashicamat
Which yeast did you use? The sugar will get fermented away completely, but I'm not sure about the extract. I'd guess that you'll be looking at about 1020ish FG. :)

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:15 pm
by Invalid Stout
Thanks. The yeast was harvested from a previous brew and probably originally generic dry yeast, I've forgotten the name of it :oops: Gervais, something like that?

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:25 pm
by Garth
Invalid Stout wrote:I've forgotten the name of it :oops: Gervais, something like that?
is that the yeast Ricky has been advertising recently....? :D

(it's Gervin)

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:38 pm
by Invalid Stout
I knew it wasn't Gervais but something similar. According to the lazynet, this is the same yeast everyone calls Nottingham on here. Is that correct?

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:56 pm
by Garth
it is supposedly, just in a smaller (6g) sachet

Re: XXXS 2008-12-14

Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 6:55 pm
by Invalid Stout
This was terribly oxidised last time I tried it. I put it in stews now :)