AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
This is an all Challanger recipe and is based on Coniston Bluebird
Folland Gnat
Date:
Gyle Number:
Fermentable Colour lb: oz Grams Ratio
Pale Malt 5 EBC 7 lbs. 14.9 oz 3600 grams 94.7%
Crystal Malt 130 EBC 0 lbs. 7.0 oz 200 grams 5.3%
Hop Variety Type Alpha Time lb: oz grams Ratio
Challenger Whole 7.6 % 60 mins 0 lbs. 1.2 oz 35 grams 70%
Challenger Whole 7.9 % 15 mins 0 lbs. 0.5 oz 15 grams 30%
Final Volume: 23 Litres
Original Gravity: 1.037
Final Gravity: 1.009
Alcohol Content: 3.6% ABV
Total Liquor: 32.1 Litres
Mash Liquor: 9.5 Litres
Mash Efficiency: 75 %
Bitterness: 36.6612479642573 EBU
Colour: 14 EBC
It's boiling away nicely at the moment.
Folland Gnat
Date:
Gyle Number:
Fermentable Colour lb: oz Grams Ratio
Pale Malt 5 EBC 7 lbs. 14.9 oz 3600 grams 94.7%
Crystal Malt 130 EBC 0 lbs. 7.0 oz 200 grams 5.3%
Hop Variety Type Alpha Time lb: oz grams Ratio
Challenger Whole 7.6 % 60 mins 0 lbs. 1.2 oz 35 grams 70%
Challenger Whole 7.9 % 15 mins 0 lbs. 0.5 oz 15 grams 30%
Final Volume: 23 Litres
Original Gravity: 1.037
Final Gravity: 1.009
Alcohol Content: 3.6% ABV
Total Liquor: 32.1 Litres
Mash Liquor: 9.5 Litres
Mash Efficiency: 75 %
Bitterness: 36.6612479642573 EBU
Colour: 14 EBC
It's boiling away nicely at the moment.
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
I pitched the yeast last night and it's fermenting nicely. I do have a question though if anyone could help. I ended up with 25l at 1.044 as opposed to the predicted OG of 1.037. I don't really mind as I'd rather it was over than under but I'd like to understand why, or what factors influence this.
Thanks
Thanks
-
- CBA Prizewinner 2010
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:06 pm
- Location: Keighley, West Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
Your Mash efficiency may be higher than that used to calculate your recipe...
I get some good Mash efficiencies but leave BeerEngine set at 80% and I'm normally near as damn it by the end of the brew
When you've collected all your wort after sparging, note how much volume you got and take a Gravity, with the BeerEngine recipe open use the Efficiency calculator with 'mash' ticked to figure out what your actual mash efficiency is (note though this can change from brew to brew / recipe to recipe / mash Temp to Mash Temp, and also differing liquor treatments)
I get some good Mash efficiencies but leave BeerEngine set at 80% and I'm normally near as damn it by the end of the brew

When you've collected all your wort after sparging, note how much volume you got and take a Gravity, with the BeerEngine recipe open use the Efficiency calculator with 'mash' ticked to figure out what your actual mash efficiency is (note though this can change from brew to brew / recipe to recipe / mash Temp to Mash Temp, and also differing liquor treatments)

Last edited by WishboneBrewery on Tue Dec 14, 2010 11:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
Sounds good, I do like Challenger. Why Folland Gnat by the way? A blast from the past but a very graceful looking aircraft.
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
As it's based on a coniston bluebird I wanted a to keep a link to the beer, the jet engine in Donald Cambell's boat was from a Folland Gnat. Tenuous I knowBryggmester wrote:Sounds good, I do like Challenger. Why Folland Gnat by the way? A blast from the past but a very graceful looking aircraft.

Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
Sounds like another good brew! Well done on improving your efficiency!JontyR wrote:As it's based on a coniston bluebird I wanted a to keep a link to the beer, the jet engine in Donald Cambell's boat was from a Folland Gnat. Tenuous I knowBryggmester wrote:Sounds good, I do like Challenger. Why Folland Gnat by the way? A blast from the past but a very graceful looking aircraft.

Its not that tenuous!

Guy

- Barley Water
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 8:35 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
In my system, I would probably get somewhere around 1.040 with the grain bill you used so your efficiency is pretty good. I would say one thing though, getting really good efficiency is over rated. What you really want is consistency from batch to batch. That way, you can plan your brews and get the hopping you want relative the the anticpated starting gravity. Also, if you get too much efficiency, you will start extracting tannins from the husks of the grain which at some point will start to effect the taste of the beer, and not in a good way.
Drinking:Saison (in bottles), Belgian Dubbel (in bottles), Oud Bruin (in bottles), Olde Ale (in bottles),
Abbey Triple (in bottles), Munich Helles, Best Bitter (TT Landlord clone), English IPA
Conditioning: Traditional bock bier, CAP
Fermenting: Munich Dunkel
Next up: Bitter (London Pride like), ESB
So many beers to make, so little time (and cold storage space)
Abbey Triple (in bottles), Munich Helles, Best Bitter (TT Landlord clone), English IPA
Conditioning: Traditional bock bier, CAP
Fermenting: Munich Dunkel
Next up: Bitter (London Pride like), ESB
So many beers to make, so little time (and cold storage space)
-
- CBA Prizewinner 2010
- Posts: 7874
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 9:06 pm
- Location: Keighley, West Yorkshire
- Contact:
Re: AG#4 Folland Gnat Bitter
So far as I'm told at work our mashes are in the 94% mark, sparging at 76c to avoid Tannins being extracted.