Try some of these great recipes out, or share your favourite brew with other forumees!
-
Uncle Joshua
Post
by Uncle Joshua » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:12 pm
swiggingpig wrote:Uncle Joshua wrote:I have a jaipur junior recipe I'd share if anyone wanted it? its only 4% but that is how I like them. Some people think its an odd hop bill but the only Jim's member to taste it (Spikesdad) said it was spot on.
I'd certainly be interested in a session strength version if you're kind enough to share it ?
Always happy to share...
Review by Spikesdad...
Spikesdad wrote:
I dont think youve done bad at all, if you were trying to copy Jaipur, but at a lower strength. Nice job, sir
Thx for swaps UJ, let me know when your ready for another one
Cheers, Dave
-
bigrichlock
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:20 am
Post
by bigrichlock » Thu Nov 01, 2012 11:14 pm
seymour wrote:bigrichlock wrote:...they have a Rolec Hopnic...could be tempted to try and get a homebrew version made?
GO YOU!
From what ive seen on the interweb its a small conical with a false bottom, where the cone starts. Would need to hole 500g of hops for 100l brew length, bottom draining with a tangential inlet?
I assume they then pump the wort through the hopnic and back into the kettle for 30 min or to the fermenter? any one know any more?
rich
-
swiggingpig
- Steady Drinker
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 3:37 pm
- Location: Huddersfield
Post
by swiggingpig » Fri Nov 02, 2012 12:17 am
Uncle Joshua wrote:swiggingpig wrote:Uncle Joshua wrote:I have a jaipur junior recipe I'd share if anyone wanted it? its only 4% but that is how I like them. Some people think its an odd hop bill but the only Jim's member to taste it (Spikesdad) said it was spot on.
I'd certainly be interested in a session strength version if you're kind enough to share it ?
Always happy to share...
Review by Spikesdad...
Spikesdad wrote:
I dont think youve done bad at all, if you were trying to copy Jaipur, but at a lower strength. Nice job, sir
Thx for swaps UJ, let me know when your ready for another one
Cheers, Dave
Thank you very much for sharing, looks very interesting, will deffo be in my next order for ingredients

-
soupdragon
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:54 pm
- Location: Wirral
Post
by soupdragon » Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:04 pm
weiht wrote:There is a thread on homebrewtalk that one of their brewer said they didnt use northern brewer and Amarillo hops. He specifically mentioned pale malt and vienna only, and ahtanum chinook and cent for hops. Interestingly no dry hop.
She did say somewhere that she had to make subs with two of the hops. It might not be a replica of Jaipur but all those who've tried it say it's close enough
I did wonder about the Nottingham yeast though but I'm tolt it works well
Cheers Tom
-
weiht
Post
by weiht » Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:11 pm
soupdragon wrote:weiht wrote:There is a thread on homebrewtalk that one of their brewer said they didnt use northern brewer and Amarillo hops. He specifically mentioned pale malt and vienna only, and ahtanum chinook and cent for hops. Interestingly no dry hop.
She did say somewhere that she had to make subs with two of the hops. It might not be a replica of Jaipur but all those who've tried it say it's close enough
I did wonder about the Nottingham yeast though but I'm tolt it works well
Cheers Tom
Not dissing it at all, heck it even won 1st place in a competition!! Just that I put this up for those who really want to clone the real thing, and not just a close enough effort. People like me have very little chance of drinking lots of great beers u guys have there, and i guess clone may be the best thing.
-
soupdragon
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:54 pm
- Location: Wirral
Post
by soupdragon » Fri Nov 02, 2012 5:32 pm
weiht wrote:Not dissing it at all, heck it even won 1st place in a competition!! Just that I put this up for those who really want to clone the real thing, and not just a close enough effort. People like me have very little chance of drinking lots of great beers u guys have there, and i guess clone may be the best thing.
That was my reason for posting the link. There are few home brewers with the correct equipment let alone the correct ingredients ( Ahtanum springs to mind, thank you BrewDog ) to be able to clone it. The best we can hope for is a close approximation.
Cheers Tom
-
bigrichlock
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 10:20 am
Post
by bigrichlock » Sat Nov 03, 2012 1:05 am
I just bought some Ahtanum and some Amarillo, shame i had to be in America to do it!
-
soupdragon
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:54 pm
- Location: Wirral
Post
by soupdragon » Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:19 pm
bigrichlock wrote:I just bought some Ahtanum and some Amarillo, shame i had to be in America to do it!
How much did you manage to bag?
Got 500g of Amarillo, 130g of Centennial so all I need to follow the " propper " hop schedule is some Ahtanum. They're as rare as hens teeth though so used Chinook as a sub...........
Cheers Tom
-
weiht
Post
by weiht » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:37 pm
I did the clone brew but used cascades in place of ahtanum, and I would say I got pretty close... I would say its about 85-90% cloned.
My beer lacked the same body as the US05 fermented pretty dry. Aroma was pretty damn close really, but mine was slightly grassy due to dry hop. I would consider not dry hopping but add more late hops!!! The commercial beer was also cleaner and slightly crisper than mine.
Recipe would get u vvvv close
-
Cozzyb
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Post
by Cozzyb » Tue Feb 19, 2013 3:34 pm
Well from being at the brewery recently, I can tell you, that the Mash temp and yeast are very wrong in this recipe.
-
seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by seymour » Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Cozzyb wrote:Well from being at the brewery recently, I can tell you, that the Mash temp and yeast are very wrong in this recipe.
That's it? You don't feel like sharing the corrected details?
-
Cozzyb
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Post
by Cozzyb » Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:50 pm
Ha, i'm not sure I should, but if someone gets it right I will say.
-
seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
-
Contact:
Post
by seymour » Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:32 pm
Cozzyb wrote:Ha, i'm not sure I should, but if someone gets it right I will say.
Fine, I'll play along:
True or False: Thornbridge Jaipur is fermented using Nottingham yeast.
-
soupdragon
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1691
- Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:54 pm
- Location: Wirral
Post
by soupdragon » Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:15 pm
Sarah Carter's Bombay IPA was based very closely on info from Thornbridge and she used Notty.
When I brewed it, it did taste rather similar to be honest
Cheers Tom
-
Cozzyb
- Hollow Legs
- Posts: 343
- Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:32 pm
Post
by Cozzyb » Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:09 am
Nottingham, no, think way outside the box, trust me I was shocked when I found out.
I.e. Don't even think English