Post
by SteveD » Fri Jan 26, 2007 1:52 am
Well, Porter was around so long, and was made in so many ways with such a wide range of ingredients at different points in it's 'time line', that any recipe you come up with that is strongish and fairlly dark could legitimately be called Porter!
Originally it was a plain brown beer, rebranded.. created as a result of the fashion for mixing brews (possibly to cover up faults in one or more casks). In the early-mid 18th century it was made exclusively from brown malt, kilned over wood, which was 'blown' ie torrified and the drink was given the name entire, intire, or entire butt, and then porter. It was certainly smoky, and Clive La Pensee reckons that Rauchbeer today is the nearest you'd get to an old Porter
Brewers and the public thought dark meant strong, before the invention of the hydrometer. Once they had that they realised how much poorer the level of extract was compared to pale malt. At that point, late 18th/early 19th Century, grists of pale/brown started to appear. As more pale was used, they maintained the illusion of strength (for the public) by keeping the beer dark with the new 'patent black malt'...so the pale/brown/black recipes appear....As time moved on, various additives were tried in order to cheapen the drink, while still maintaining the appearance of quality and strength....burnt caramel, liquorice, chilli, all sorts was chucked in. Brown malt, the original porter malt, was virtually phased out.
Inevitably the quality suffered and Porter went into decline, helped on it's way by the arrival and popularity of IPA and pale ale.
That's one view....there are as many Porter theories as there are beer historians.....the 'Ralf Harwood invented it' story is almost certainly bollocks.
Discuss...