What do you think to this recipe/idea?
What do you think to this recipe/idea?
I like a nice malty beer but with a nice hoppiness to it as well - can anyone comment on this idea?
for 23l
3.37kg Marris Otter (76%)
0.89kg Crystal (20%)
0.18kg Munich (4%)
Hops:
9.92 g Amarillo - Boil 20.0 mins
9.92 g Chinook- Boil 20.0 min
9.92 g Citra - Boil 15.0 min
9.92 g Mosaic - Boil 10.0 min
ending with OG 1.042
IBU: 27
EBC: 24.5
Thinking of using notty or s04 with this one.
Any thoughts or suggestions? I normally use a bit of wheat malt for the head retention but thought i might try without for this one.
for 23l
3.37kg Marris Otter (76%)
0.89kg Crystal (20%)
0.18kg Munich (4%)
Hops:
9.92 g Amarillo - Boil 20.0 mins
9.92 g Chinook- Boil 20.0 min
9.92 g Citra - Boil 15.0 min
9.92 g Mosaic - Boil 10.0 min
ending with OG 1.042
IBU: 27
EBC: 24.5
Thinking of using notty or s04 with this one.
Any thoughts or suggestions? I normally use a bit of wheat malt for the head retention but thought i might try without for this one.
- seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
20% Crystal is massive. Not unheard of, Sarah Hughes Ruby Dark Mild is supposedly that high, but prepare yourself for a toffee-bomb. The malt-sweetness would definitely support a lot more hops if you wanna upgrade it to a Brown IPA.
A more typical rule of thumb would be 10% max Crystal, but screw typical. Happy brewing.
A more typical rule of thumb would be 10% max Crystal, but screw typical. Happy brewing.
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
You could swap the Munich and Crystal around. Also, I'd add some more late hops to steep or dry hop.
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
yup unless you have a sweet tooth lower the crystal to less than 10%
i would go as low as 3%
what colour is the crystal?
surely not a 20 minute boil that's not enough min 90 mins for me
i would go as low as 3%
what colour is the crystal?
surely not a 20 minute boil that's not enough min 90 mins for me
- scuppeteer
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1512
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 7:32 pm
- Location: Brenchley, Kent (Birthplace of Fuggles... or is it?)
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
I would agree, too much crystal.
The hop additions are fine assuming you have only posted when they go in, obviously you would be boiling the wort for an hour overall.
The hop additions are fine assuming you have only posted when they go in, obviously you would be boiling the wort for an hour overall.
Dave Berry
Can't be arsed to keep changing this bit, so, drinking some beer and wanting to brew many more!
Sir, you are drunk! Yes madam, and you are ugly, but in the morning I shall be sober! - WSC
Can't be arsed to keep changing this bit, so, drinking some beer and wanting to brew many more!
Sir, you are drunk! Yes madam, and you are ugly, but in the morning I shall be sober! - WSC
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
Yep those are just hop boiling times not the overall boil length.
The reason for the high crystal is because of a recipe I scribbled down from a beer I liked in my old local with microbrewery. It wasn't over sweet, more like a deep brown best bitter, and the brewer assured me those are the percentages. I might up the hops and pop some more in at flameout for aroma
The reason for the high crystal is because of a recipe I scribbled down from a beer I liked in my old local with microbrewery. It wasn't over sweet, more like a deep brown best bitter, and the brewer assured me those are the percentages. I might up the hops and pop some more in at flameout for aroma
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
will_raymo2000 wrote:Yep those are just hop boiling times not the overall boil length.
The reason for the high crystal is because of a recipe I scribbled down from a beer I liked in my old local with microbrewery. I might up the hops and pop some more in at flameout for aroma
if it's a known and tasted recipe you like go for it

- seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
+1NobbyIPA wrote:if it's a known and tasted recipe you like go for it
Do you mind sharing which commercial beer it was?
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
It's based on this beer - Green Goose from Mill Green Brewery http://www.millgreenbrewery.co.uk/green-goose.html
And the recipe is briefly discussed here: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 3412624606
Reading the description on the website I'm going to up the late hops by quite a bit.
And the recipe is briefly discussed here: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_ ... 3412624606
Reading the description on the website I'm going to up the late hops by quite a bit.
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
Americans are obsessed with crystal malt, though! 

- seymour
- It's definitely Lock In Time
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 6:51 pm
- Location: Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA
- Contact:
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
You think? I think modern American brewers are much more obsessed with Munich Malt (a very light Crystal Malt, I suppose, but also a worthy base malt in its own right) and lightly toasted malts such as Victory or Belgian Biscuit. I seldom see APA and A-IPA recipes with more than 3-5% Crystal. I still associate heavy Crystal Malt usage with English brewers, but maybe that's a misconception.JKaranka wrote:Americans are obsessed with crystal malt, though!
Perhaps you're saying Americans are obsessed with putting too much Crystal Malt in their English Ale clones? Perhaps, but all the brewers I know stick to clone brewing guides by English authors...
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
What about American red ales? And crystal in porter, stout, mild, barleywine, IPA. You rarely see an American recipe without crystal malt for a British style plus they have the most crystal heavy style in the world in their red. I understand that a lot is to give character to their 2 row, but still it's a lot of crystal. And it often replaces things like amber malt, brown malt, brewers caramel or invert syrup.
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
As well as having 20% crystal, you have a yeast that won't attenuate all the way, so there's a risk that the beer will be sweet and cloying. However, this can work in a light beer if you balance it with enough bitterness from the hops. If you cut the crystal to under 5%, the lack of body in a light beer can leave you with something watery.
Incidentally, "malty" doesn't mean sweet. You get malt flavour from the Munich, but sweetness from the crystal. It's possible to make very malty beers with malts like Vienna and Munich that are also dry; likewise you can make sweet or full-bodied beers with crystal or carapils that don't taste malty.
Incidentally, "malty" doesn't mean sweet. You get malt flavour from the Munich, but sweetness from the crystal. It's possible to make very malty beers with malts like Vienna and Munich that are also dry; likewise you can make sweet or full-bodied beers with crystal or carapils that don't taste malty.
Last edited by Charles1968 on Wed Oct 08, 2014 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
More with Carapils and Munich, I would say. Especially Carapils. They find their way into lots of American recipes for German and Belgian beers. Even jamil zainasheff puts Carapils in pilsners. American takes on English bitter tend to have a bit too much crystal in my experience.JKaranka wrote:Americans are obsessed with crystal malt, though!
- orlando
- So far gone I'm on the way back again!
- Posts: 7201
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 3:22 pm
- Location: North Norfolk: Nearest breweries All Day Brewery, Salle. Panther, Reepham. Yetman's, Holt
Re: What do you think to this recipe/idea?
I would echo what has been said so far, especially using "malty" malts like Munich rather than sweet malts like Crystal, particularly dark crystal, and add a couple of things. Balancing a beer is in my view a neglected aspect of recipe design, getting the balance between malt sweetness and bitterness is what often distinguishes a commercial beer from a lot of the HB I try. In your recipe you want a malt forward beer so you have some options to pursue like mashing a little higher or choosing a low attenuating yeast.Do not neglect the role of the hops though or you will end up with a cloying overly sweet beer, at an IBU of only 27 I think you're in trouble. Balance the hop bitterness flavour and aroma by ensuring 3 additions at least, at the beginning towards the end and at the end.
However there is one other caveat to discuss, one thing brewers never reveal about their beers is the water profile they brewed with, this can have a profound effect on the flavour impression of that beer, now your brewer may not have done anything to his water in which case your chances of cloning are improved, if he has then less so. If water treatment isn't part of your regime then this might be superfluous but I would look for a 1:1 sulphate to chloride ratio to help achieve the brown ale profile this recipe appears to have.
However there is one other caveat to discuss, one thing brewers never reveal about their beers is the water profile they brewed with, this can have a profound effect on the flavour impression of that beer, now your brewer may not have done anything to his water in which case your chances of cloning are improved, if he has then less so. If water treatment isn't part of your regime then this might be superfluous but I would look for a 1:1 sulphate to chloride ratio to help achieve the brown ale profile this recipe appears to have.
I am "The Little Red Brooster"
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer
Fermenting:
Conditioning:
Drinking: Southwold Again,
Up Next: John Barleycorn (Barley Wine)
Planning: Winter drinking Beer