Don't forget, all commercial breweries use an industrial CFC and end up with the break in the fermenters.Vossy1 wrote:The next time I looked at it the tube was FULL of fluffy protein ppt.
Now whilst this may have no effect on the finnished article, I don't like the idea of that stuff being in the fermenter with the yeast.
Immersion Chillers Vs Counterflow Chillers
- Andy
- Virtually comatose but still standing
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Ash, Surrey
- Contact:
Dan!
I got that protein stuff too Vossy, in the trial jar on my second AG, my first was a stout so wouldn't have noticed it
Just by chance I took a picture, it did over about 30-40 mins sink to the bottom of the jar

It didn't spoil the beer at all that I could detect so I'm not really bothered now, but did like your self consider using a immersion
Just by chance I took a picture, it did over about 30-40 mins sink to the bottom of the jar

It didn't spoil the beer at all that I could detect so I'm not really bothered now, but did like your self consider using a immersion
This may have been mentioned before but a guy that does a popular podcast on the Brewing Network, Jamil Zainasheff, has an interesting chiller idea. It's a cross between an immersion and a whirlpool. The whirlpool keeps the beer moving so heat removal is much better than usual.
You do need a pump though.
Here's the link http://www.mrmalty.com/chiller.php
BTW...isn't that a cool domain name?
You do need a pump though.
Here's the link http://www.mrmalty.com/chiller.php
BTW...isn't that a cool domain name?
Does anyone know or has anyone tested,
At what point on an immersion/cfc does the number of coils in the loop become unimportant.
Ie, at some point the exiting temp of the coolant will reach wort temp, by coil number x, so it's pointless having more coils in the system
Look at these shiny things, though only 4.5m.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/REMOTE-BEER-COOLE ... dZViewItem
At what point on an immersion/cfc does the number of coils in the loop become unimportant.
Ie, at some point the exiting temp of the coolant will reach wort temp, by coil number x, so it's pointless having more coils in the system

Look at these shiny things, though only 4.5m.
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/REMOTE-BEER-COOLE ... dZViewItem
- Andy
- Virtually comatose but still standing
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:00 pm
- Location: Ash, Surrey
- Contact:
Don't know but I did see some postings on rec.crafts.brewing about this type of thing and someone suggested having two separate (smaller) coils both fed from the same cooling supply as opposed to one huuuuuge coil (sory bertha!). Makes sense as obviously there will be a point at which the cooling water has heated up and is serving no additional benefit.
Dan!
Hmmm, Just had a look at that sight Andy and I can see an improvement straight away.
Most posts are assuming only one feed in to the IC.
If the supply is standard garden hose, say 16mm bore with a good pressure you could make 2 coils (8 0r 10mm copper microbore) for the IC, split the feed in (at hlt entry) so each recieves a cold feed, and join the outlets together so there's only one outlet.
Sound reasonable
Most posts are assuming only one feed in to the IC.
If the supply is standard garden hose, say 16mm bore with a good pressure you could make 2 coils (8 0r 10mm copper microbore) for the IC, split the feed in (at hlt entry) so each recieves a cold feed, and join the outlets together so there's only one outlet.
Sound reasonable
