I posted this on the back of beers that were proving the pudding to be incorrect (ie. unexpectedly not bitter enough)
Those here who brew anything have total choice as to the level of IBU's they try to put in their beer. This is all worked back to the AA's put on the back, but by appreciating the storage and age you can get closer to approximating your hops potential at time of brewing. I hear you about the historical limitations there were on scientific analysis concerning the fine Durden Park re-worked historical brews. They hopped from experience and judged beers as they went along. I brewed 2 at the turn of the year, one is mature and now cracking, the second I'm gonna enjoy in a months time. Got to totally recommend the 1880 Simmonds Bitter and 1850 London Porter. Can you get the book Martin? If not some are on DP website. This isn't a gripey comeback post at all. Buy a spare corni, fill it with DP and forget it 'til Xmas, they're top draw.
I think the point I wanted to highlight in this thread is, if you are brewing beers that you want to have a specific hop bitterness profile then be aware that the ability for any hop to impart bitterness degrades over time. This is something I did not account for. It matters when brewing a 1.045 bitter and expecting 32 IBU's and you only get 19. Now I have a keg of well aroma hopped 'very mild'.
Just trying to help prevent others experiencing an easily remediable fault.
Now this is considered and I've dumped God knows what in the last brew to use up unspecific hops, can't wait for the next brewday! I consider myself reinvigorated (if that was necessary).
