Safale 04
I like the 04 too. I find it's starts quickly if you just pitch it in to the wort, however I now rehydrate a satchet first and then pitch. This evenings effort was going like the clappers about 2 hours after pitching. I seem to do OK with one satchet for 5 gallons. I use two if I'm doing lager and so want to ferment at a lower temperature for which I use s23.
Butterscotch beer
Long time homebrewer, first time communicator. In brews gone by I've used a variety of yeasts (slurry) borrowed from generous brewers but not wanting to be classed as a beggar I decided to delve into the world of dried yeasts - Safale S-04..... with disasterous effects. My first beer fermented within 4 days but was rife with diacetyl. I left the beer 24 hours hoping the yeast would mop up the stuff naturally but to no avail so I added more S-04 and roused. Two days later still no joy, so chilled and bottled. Appreciating diacetyl can be an off flavour from infection I cleaned meticulously and tried again, adding S-04 again. Today is day four of fermentation and the beer is ready to chill except for the diacetyl again, so its back to a brewer tomorrow to plead for some yeast. I think people have different taste thresholds for diacetyl - I hate the sickly sweet stuff - but I'm sure I'll get plenty of takers for the brew. So, after that long winded rant, a question or two. Failing adding a yeast capable of removing diacetyl do I have any other options? Has anyone else has the same trouble with Safale S-04 or dried yeast in generally?
Surprised / disappointed it will take that long for the yeast to mop it up and as I tend to brew beers around the 6-6.5% mark should I have concerns about yeast autolysis from the 10-12 day fermentation leading to subsequent 'yeast bitten' flavours? Any other dried yeasts you recommend that wouldn't give me this diacetyl please?
It takes much longer than that for any autolysis or off-flavours to occur, over a month I would imagine. I've certainly had no problems leaving my beer for 3 or 4 weeks in the primary.
I think SO4 is the only one known for diacetyl, you could try any of the others like Nottingham, Safale US-56, Gervin English Ale, etc.
I think SO4 is the only one known for diacetyl, you could try any of the others like Nottingham, Safale US-56, Gervin English Ale, etc.
That surely depends on the size of the flocculent particles.surely a floculant yeast makes an ideal yeast for bottle conditioning
Using So4, the particlulate I have been encountering, have been up to 10mm across.
This does't make for a particularly easy to pour pint

Nottingham/Gervin produces much finer flocculent, in my limited use of this yeast, and the yeast bed in the bottle is far more compact.
As said, I can only comment from my limited experience, which is not as in depth as others.
Hmm, neither am I nowNot sure what happened there then V

With my kits which are usually supplied with Gervin or equiv I get a really smooth cream like yeast cake.
With S04 on the 4 brews I've used it with, I've ended up with what I can only describe as bunches of grapes type yeast cake, and that was before adding finnings

Were talking clumps that roll over each other as I tip the fermentor to empty it....very strange