Best quality f/v

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
akka lakka

Best quality f/v

Post by akka lakka » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:42 pm

Hi all

What is the best quality f/v,the f/v i am using is starting to get rough and pitted after only about 10 brews,admitted i got it cheap from wilco's,i am worried after last f/v caused infection no matter how well it was cleaned.

Cheers joe

User avatar
keith1664
Lost in an Alcoholic Haze
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 8:54 pm
Location: Norwich

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by keith1664 » Wed Jan 23, 2013 11:53 pm

In or near Norwich? Interested in meeting up monthly to talk and drink beer? PM me for details.

User avatar
alix101
Under the Table
Posts: 1786
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:34 am
Location: Chester-le-street Durham

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by alix101 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:47 am

Yes the blichmann is the dogs...but a quality affordable option would be a glass carboy, I always think my carboy beers taste better, thats probably in my head but they won't scratch easy ...unless you drop it :shock:
"Everybody should belive in something : and I belive I'll have another drink".

User avatar
sunny_jimbob
Piss Artist
Posts: 241
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:05 pm
Location: Yorkshire

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by sunny_jimbob » Thu Jan 24, 2013 9:57 am

I've got one of these which is surprisingly sturdy.
Planck Length Brewery
Fermenting: AG#27 Spectroscope, AG#28 Astatine
Conditioning: AG#25 Event Horizon, AG#26 Planck Postulate, Kit#9 Delta
Drinking: AG#19 - Spectral Line, AG#20 - Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, AG#22 Inertial Confinement Fusion, AG#23 Nebula, AG#24 Olympus Mons

"Beauty is in the hand of the beerholder" brew blog | beer blog

akka lakka

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by akka lakka » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:00 am

Hi

Too expensive and will not fit in fermenting fridge,i was thinking are there better quality plastic fermenting bins,or could i use a s/s stock pot.

Cheers joe

User avatar
hotmog
Piss Artist
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by hotmog » Thu Jan 24, 2013 11:22 am

I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean. :)

Image

dreadskin69

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by dreadskin69 » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:16 pm

apparently those big blue barrels people use as water butts are food grade. they come in all sorts of sizes, all the way up to 225 ltrs, and are cheap enough and air tight. anyone use them?

akka lakka

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by akka lakka » Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:21 pm

Thanks all

Think i like the s/s 30 litre stock pot,I will nip on flea bay and see what size they are.

cheers joe.

User avatar
Jocky
Even further under the Table
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by Jocky » Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:08 pm

hotmog wrote:I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean. :)

Image
Interesting.

Do you use your stock pots for anything other than fermenting? Just wondering how your whole process work with them.
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.

Underground Joe

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by Underground Joe » Thu Jan 24, 2013 1:37 pm

I was thinking about getting some stainless pots to ferment in, but I was looking at doing it due to fact that my plastic fermenters seem to absorb a lot of hop aroma that I think a stainless pot would leave in the beer.

User avatar
hotmog
Piss Artist
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by hotmog » Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:43 pm

Jocky wrote:
hotmog wrote:I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean. :)

Image
Interesting.

Do you use your stock pots for anything other than fermenting? Just wondering how your whole process work with them.
No, they're only used as FVs. I brew in 38l lengths, ie enough for 2 x 19l cornies, so each stockpot is just under 2/3rds full, which allows adequate headroom for the foam when the cooled wort is poured in from the boiler, and later for the yeast krausen.

The shelf on which they sit is about 12" above the height of a cornie, so once the fermentation's over I can transfer direct by gravity. No need for siphon tubes, nor even to lift the lid, thus minimising the risk of airborne infection. Prior to filling, I sterilise the stockpots by pouring in a kettle-full of boiling water, swilling it around and leaving for several minutes, then emptying and spraying all over with StarSan.

Image

User avatar
Jocky
Even further under the Table
Posts: 2738
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by Jocky » Thu Jan 24, 2013 5:15 pm

Does the position of the taps on your stock pots not cause them to pick up a lot of trub?
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.

User avatar
hotmog
Piss Artist
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by hotmog » Thu Jan 24, 2013 6:04 pm

Jocky wrote:Does the position of the taps on your stock pots not cause them to pick up a lot of trub?
No. Before I connect the line to to the cornie, I open the tap into a glass underneath to collect the first runnings that contain the yeast sediment immediately under the pipe opening, which I discard (it's only a small cupful). By careful positioning of the tap hole, and using a 15mm copper elbow facing downwards on the inside so that there is only a 2mm gap between the opening and the bottom, there is virtually no wastage whatsoever. The yeast sediment immediately underneath the elbow opening is obviously drawn up, but that really is a minimal amount and nothing around it is disturbed. There is no need to tip the FV up to drain to the last drop - it does that automatically. There is only a very thin surface covering of liquid left above the yeast.

Image

Obviously, for this to work you need to exploit the syphon effect fully. I connect the FV ball-valve taps to the cornie outlet posts via JG 1/2" BSP - 3/8" connectors, and there is around a 9" - 12" drop to the cornie positioned beneath.

Image

Belter

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by Belter » Thu Jan 24, 2013 7:38 pm

Is that THREE STIR PLATES?!?!?!

I never envisaged needing more than one!

Now I have a more like 80L brew length perhaps I'll start building the next one. 3 batches each with a different yeast

User avatar
hotmog
Piss Artist
Posts: 296
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
Contact:

Re: Best quality f/v

Post by hotmog » Thu Jan 24, 2013 8:21 pm

Belter wrote:Is that THREE STIR PLATES?!?!?!

I never envisaged needing more than one!

Now I have a more like 80L brew length perhaps I'll start building the next one. 3 batches each with a different yeast
Three's not excessive :D.

It all boiled down to a choice of making two stir-plates for 2 x 3l conicals, or making three for 3 x 2l conicals. I couldn't get hold of any 3l ones, and they are prohibitively expensive anyway, so I opted for the second option.

My rationale was quite simple: when I first decided to venture into the mysterious world of liquid yeast I sought advice on this forum about the best way to proceed. Being a tight-arsed git, I wanted to make a stepped starter from just 1/3rd of single vial of Whitelabs that would be enough for my 38l brew length. The received wisdom (many thanks to Wolfy especially) was that I needed a 3-step starter.

Step 1 - 250ml
Step 2 -> 1 ltr
Step 3 -> 3.5 ltr

Given that the conicals can realistically only be filled up to less than half their maximum capacity when used for for this purpose, you will probably now appreciate why I needed three of them, each with their own stir-plate, to accomplish Step 3 :wink: .

Post Reply