Beaverdale Wine Kit

For any alcoholic brew that doesn't fit into any of the above categories!
Post Reply
Mitchamitri

Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by Mitchamitri » Thu Jan 29, 2009 11:27 am

Planning on trying the above, but although they work out cheap per bottle the initial outlay feels high campared with a tenner for a brewkit.
So, before I "splash" out does anyone have any recommendations as to which one. looking to do a red of soem sort but not a shiraz.

Kristoff

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by Kristoff » Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:53 pm

All the Beaverdale wines are very good quality and are made from the actual grape varities they are labelled as. I've done a few now and they've all been great and to me they tast like the real thing - i.e. a Merlot tastes like a Merlot and a Pinot Grigio tastes like Pinot Grigio etc.
I'd say comparing a cheap wine kit to a Beaverdale kit is the same as comparing a cheap Kit beer to AG.
Go for it i'm sure you won't be disappointed. If you're not sure, get the 6 bottle kit £12-£15, but the 30 bottle kits are much better value at £38 ish :)

User avatar
Horden Hillbilly
Moderator
Posts: 2150
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: Horden, Co. Durham
Contact:

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by Horden Hillbilly » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:29 pm

Kristoff wrote:All the Beaverdale wines are very good quality and are made from the actual grape varities they are labelled as. I've done a few now and they've all been great and to me they tast like the real thing - i.e. a Merlot tastes like a Merlot and a Pinot Grigio tastes like Pinot Grigio etc.
I'd say comparing a cheap wine kit to a Beaverdale kit is the same as comparing a cheap Kit beer to AG.
Go for it i'm sure you won't be disappointed. If you're not sure, get the 6 bottle kit £12-£15, but the 30 bottle kits are much better value at £38 ish :)
Seconded, I'm sure that you won't be disapointed with the Beaverdale kits. Regarding choice, as Kristoff points out, they are true to type, so all you need to do is pick your favourite wine, ie Merlot, Barolo, etc.

sparky Paul

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by sparky Paul » Thu Jan 29, 2009 5:35 pm

The Beaverdale kits are excellent. Kenridge kits are excellent too and also worth considering.

arturobandini
Under the Table
Posts: 1212
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: North London

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by arturobandini » Sat Jan 31, 2009 2:36 am

My Parents got me a Beaverdale kit some years ago as a Christmas gift and I erm....did it last week having not quite got my AG kit ready and wanting to do brewing of any kind. I had a Californian Red kit and a Chardonnay of the 6 bottle size and they've been bubbling quietly for about 10 days so far. The instructions say wait 15ish for a white and then add stabiliser to stop the ferment completely, wait a few days then fine, wait a few more days then fine some more.

That's all well and good if I suppose I was going to just nail them asap. If I wanted to just let them reach a better standard could I not just rack them off the sediment into a clean demijohn and allow it to clear naturally (I'm aware this could take some months) then rack it off any further sediment before bottling? I wouldn't use "stabiliser" or "finings" in Beer unless I really had to. I'm fine to let it sit and do it's thing. Anyone any experience of the non-additives route to winemaking?
Planning - Not for a long while

Fermenting - I'm Done

Bottle Maturing - Hobgoblin, Fullers ESB, American Stout, TOP, Fullers London Porter, Bandini Black IPA

Drinking - Still...Whiskey

sparky Paul

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by sparky Paul » Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:56 am

arturobandini wrote:That's all well and good if I suppose I was going to just nail them asap. If I wanted to just let them reach a better standard could I not just rack them off the sediment into a clean demijohn and allow it to clear naturally (I'm aware this could take some months) then rack it off any further sediment before bottling? I wouldn't use "stabiliser" or "finings" in Beer unless I really had to. I'm fine to let it sit and do it's thing. Anyone any experience of the non-additives route to winemaking?
I invariably find that the kits need more time that the instructions say anyway - it's just so they can say it's a '7 day wine' or '28 day wine', etc.. I don't think the things you add to kit wine do any harm, they are added to most commercial wines after all.

You need to stabilise to ensure that no further fermentation takes place, and the addition of campden preservative is recommended if you wish to lay down and age any of your wine. Finings can easily be dispensed with, and replaced with time, but as they don't end up in the final wine they shouldn't have any effect either.

arturobandini
Under the Table
Posts: 1212
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:14 pm
Location: North London

Re: Beaverdale Wine Kit

Post by arturobandini » Sat Jan 31, 2009 3:14 pm

Cheers Paul,

I wasn't trying to suggest that it would taint the beer or anything I was just idly wondering whether it was imperative to the creation of good wine. I was going to wait until all bubbling stopped or slowed significantly and then rack off into clean Demijohns , check hydrometer readings and leave in a cooler area to drop bright. Then possibly bottle after this.

I've got a wine making book from Ben Turner, which has just materialised out of nowhere, and it's pretty informative if a tad dated in it's methods
Planning - Not for a long while

Fermenting - I'm Done

Bottle Maturing - Hobgoblin, Fullers ESB, American Stout, TOP, Fullers London Porter, Bandini Black IPA

Drinking - Still...Whiskey

Post Reply