What next?

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
Post Reply
Pete

What next?

Post by Pete » Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:14 pm

Hi

I am looking for some guidance...

I have now done 2 full grain brews, neither of which were resounding successes and are not yet drinkable. I have an extremely effective counterflow wort cooler, I use my boiler as a mash tun with a 10" spinning sparging arm, my efficiency is around 60%, I have found an extremely helpful forum & web site, I have a soon to be converted cornie and a plastic keg and use a pad to heat my fermenting bin.

What do I do now? Where should I concentrate to improve my efficiency? When you guys were in a similar position, what did you do? I fancy trying Hefe so I have a more immediate beer to drink or should I try and perfect one type of beer? Where should I next look to improve my gadgets (is a separate mash tun necessary?)?

Really not sure and would love some advice.

Regards

Pete

User avatar
Jim
Site Admin
Posts: 10312
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2004 1:00 pm
Location: Washington, UK

Post by Jim » Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:57 pm

What did I do after I made my first couple of all-grain batches? Drank beer 'till I fell over, to be honest. :wink:

First thing is to wait for your first batch to be properly matured and ready to drink so that you can judge whether you need to tweak the recipe to get the kind of balance you want, and what (if anything) is lacking in the brew(s) you already made. You need to set up a feedback loop to help steer you towards improvement, rather than stabbing in the dark.

As far as efficiency is concerned, there are several areas where you could lose extract - you need to have a look at each stage of your process from the crush of the grain to the run-off from the boiler. Compare your processes with what others do, and try to look for possible improvements.

Oh, and ask questions here, of course. :wink:
NURSE!! He's out of bed again!

JBK on Facebook
JBK on Twitter

User avatar
Garth
Falling off the Barstool
Posts: 3565
Joined: Tue Aug 22, 2006 1:00 pm
Location: Durham

Post by Garth » Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:58 pm

Hi Pete,

I cannot really give you any guidance as I am, like you, new to all grain (done only three so far and none ready for tasting), but by following a recipe and getting near identical OG's/litres, my efficiency is around the 70-75% mark, I don't know whether it's necessary but I use a separate mash tun in the form of the popular cool box design with a copper slotted manifold, it holds 65'C over two hours no problem, then use a spiny sparge 8.5" arm. So maybe you would like to try that approach, I also have a smaller Ritchies boiler I use soley for a HLT, simply as I find that an easier option. HLT on top of the fridge, mash tun on the bench, collection vessel (ferm. bin so you can see how much you've collected) on the floor. My three tier setup!!

IMO, as long as your beer is good, tasty and drinkable, I wouldn't worry about efficiency at the moment, 60% is good anyway for a start. Quality not quantity mate. and as it's been said on here many times 'grain is cheap' so why worry

BTW my cfc works mega-efficiently also!! especially with the temp of water a the moment!!

and I'm hoping that the forum that you're talking about is this one!!

it's the business!!!

Totem

Post by Totem » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:11 pm

by efficiency you mean how many pints you get out of it from the amount of water that you put in?

Kev.

Post by Kev. » Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:30 pm

My best advice would be brew as much and as often as you can.......and more importantly than that ....enjoy doing it! :D

I'd agree with not worrying too much about your efficiency to begin with as long as you're happy with your end results, relax don’t worry have a home brew!

User avatar
crow_flies
Hollow Legs
Posts: 358
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 11:51 am
Location: Winterton-on-Sea

Post by crow_flies » Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:57 pm

I've found my biggest improvements to quality have been through improving water quality (filtering / removing chlorine effectively and reducing carbonates to match the beer style.

My son and I just cracked open a bottle I made probably a year ago and compared it with a barrel which is just drinking - the bottle tastes like 'home brew' the other tastes like beer.

Other than that this forum is fantastic for reading how others are doing things improving each step of my own process.....

/CF

Frothy

Post by Frothy » Sun Nov 19, 2006 11:27 pm

I'd keep experimenting with recipes until you find one you really like- then you can adjust that recipe to make your very own beer complete with dodgy name :)

Otherwise you can start getting pedantic about pH, precise temp control HERMS, shiny things etc. etc.

what have you been brewing?
Matt

Pete

Post by Pete » Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:02 am

Thanks everyone, good advice.

Naturally the web site and forum I refer to is jimsbeerkit - where else???

Trouble with waiting to taste the beer is it takes WEEKS! I'm all ready to keep brewing until I achieve a clockwork operation - I just don't have enough kegs.

Pete

PieOPah

Post by PieOPah » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:45 am

One thing to note when fly sparging is that it should be done slowly. When done slowly
a) it gives the sugar time to dissolve
b) doesn't disturb the grain bed so the flow is even rather than channeled

Also with fly sparging you should sparge until your runoff reaches a specific gravity (1.010 IIRC) rather than a specific volume. Personally I have never understood why you do this as you may end up with way more wort than you need. This wort is then wasted (what can you do with it if you don't need it?)

User avatar
Andy
Virtually comatose but still standing
Posts: 8716
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:00 pm
Location: Ash, Surrey
Contact:

Post by Andy » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:50 am

Also with fly sparging you should sparge until your runoff reaches a specific gravity (1.010 IIRC) rather than a specific volume. Personally I have never understood why you do this as you may end up with way more wort than you need. This wort is then wasted (what can you do with it if you don't need it?)
PoP - if you collect the volume you need for boiling + topping up then there's no need to continue sparging! Of course you could collect the extra wort, boil it up, cool it and put into plastic bottles in the freezer for use as starters in the future...
Dan!

PieOPah

Post by PieOPah » Tue Nov 21, 2006 9:56 am

Andy wrote: PoP - if you collect the volume you need for boiling + topping up then there's no need to continue sparging! Of course you could collect the extra wort, boil it up, cool it and put into plastic bottles in the freezer for use as starters in the future...
That makes sense. I assume then that the 1.010 is just the guide for when you should stop to ensure you don't leech tanins? I would like to give Fly Sparging a go - just need to get me that 3 tier set up!

User avatar
Andy
Virtually comatose but still standing
Posts: 8716
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:00 pm
Location: Ash, Surrey
Contact:

Post by Andy » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:01 am

You got it - if you continue sparging in an attempt to reach a volume and the gravity goes too low (1006-1010 is usually quoted) then apparently undesirables can be rinsed out of the grains and impart unpleasant flavours into the end product. As grain is cheap then upping the grain bill makes this situation "manageable" 8)
Dan!

User avatar
Andy
Virtually comatose but still standing
Posts: 8716
Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 1:00 pm
Location: Ash, Surrey
Contact:

Post by Andy » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:05 am

PoP - it's pretty easy to setup a 3-tier brewery. I use a fold-up table, a council plastic recycling box and a clothes basket :lol:

If you collect the sparging output in a small brewing bucket in stages then you don't need much clearance between the mash tun and the floor.
Dan!

DJP

Post by DJP » Wed Nov 22, 2006 6:23 pm

Absolutely. For my last few brews I've used about 5 litres less sparge water than usual and then topped up the boiler to the normal volume with plain water. It's improved my beers no end and, what's more, it has made hardly any difference to the OG.

I conclude that the last 4 or 5 litres of the sparge often yields surprisingly little in the way of usable extract - and runs a disproportionate risk of extracting undesirable tannins.

Post Reply