I had it in my head that it was Nottingham too, but couldn't find anything on here about it.Clibit wrote:Ok, thought I read it was. Apologies.
I have got some Wilko Gervin (Nottingham), so will probably use this anyway.
Cheers
MB
I had it in my head that it was Nottingham too, but couldn't find anything on here about it.Clibit wrote:Ok, thought I read it was. Apologies.
It was at one of the festivals and I'm fairly sure someone asked Rob the question and he said it wasn't Nottingham. But a few drinks had been taken. Wilkos yeast is Nottingham I believe.Monkeybrew wrote:I had it in my head that it was Nottingham too, but couldn't find anything on here about it.Clibit wrote:Ok, thought I read it was. Apologies.
I have got some Wilko Gervin (Nottingham), so will probably use this anyway.
Cheers
MB
He might just be saying it's not re-packaged Danstar Nottingham. For obvious reasons.f00b4r wrote:Rob has mentioned it here or the craft forum as well.
I reckon any water profile that's OK for a bitter will be fine for this one.alexlark wrote:Jim, any views on a water profile for the brew?
I'm probably going to use GW's Sweet Pale Ale profile.alexlark wrote:Jim, any views on a water profile for the brew?
I remember him saying that it's not Nottingham but it is very similar. Of course he might be lying, but why bother? More people would probably buy it if they thought it was.Clibit wrote:He might just be saying it's not re-packaged Danstar Nottingham. For obvious reasons.f00b4r wrote:Rob has mentioned it here or the craft forum as well.
I went for the halfway house in the end, 75 minutes (had to pop down Tescos).alexlark wrote:On the day I'm going for a 90min mash.