Best quality f/v
Best quality f/v
Hi all
What is the best quality f/v,the f/v i am using is starting to get rough and pitted after only about 10 brews,admitted i got it cheap from wilco's,i am worried after last f/v caused infection no matter how well it was cleaned.
Cheers joe
What is the best quality f/v,the f/v i am using is starting to get rough and pitted after only about 10 brews,admitted i got it cheap from wilco's,i am worried after last f/v caused infection no matter how well it was cleaned.
Cheers joe
Re: Best quality f/v
In or near Norwich? Interested in meeting up monthly to talk and drink beer? PM me for details.
- alix101
- Under the Table
- Posts: 1786
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:34 am
- Location: Chester-le-street Durham
Re: Best quality f/v
Yes the blichmann is the dogs...but a quality affordable option would be a glass carboy, I always think my carboy beers taste better, thats probably in my head but they won't scratch easy ...unless you drop it 

"Everybody should belive in something : and I belive I'll have another drink".
- sunny_jimbob
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 5:05 pm
- Location: Yorkshire
Re: Best quality f/v
I've got one of these which is surprisingly sturdy.
Planck Length Brewery
Fermenting: AG#27 Spectroscope, AG#28 Astatine
Conditioning: AG#25 Event Horizon, AG#26 Planck Postulate, Kit#9 Delta
Drinking: AG#19 - Spectral Line, AG#20 - Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, AG#22 Inertial Confinement Fusion, AG#23 Nebula, AG#24 Olympus Mons
"Beauty is in the hand of the beerholder" brew blog | beer blog
Fermenting: AG#27 Spectroscope, AG#28 Astatine
Conditioning: AG#25 Event Horizon, AG#26 Planck Postulate, Kit#9 Delta
Drinking: AG#19 - Spectral Line, AG#20 - Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, AG#22 Inertial Confinement Fusion, AG#23 Nebula, AG#24 Olympus Mons
"Beauty is in the hand of the beerholder" brew blog | beer blog
Re: Best quality f/v
Hi
Too expensive and will not fit in fermenting fridge,i was thinking are there better quality plastic fermenting bins,or could i use a s/s stock pot.
Cheers joe
Too expensive and will not fit in fermenting fridge,i was thinking are there better quality plastic fermenting bins,or could i use a s/s stock pot.
Cheers joe
- hotmog
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
- Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
- Contact:
Re: Best quality f/v
I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean.


Re: Best quality f/v
apparently those big blue barrels people use as water butts are food grade. they come in all sorts of sizes, all the way up to 225 ltrs, and are cheap enough and air tight. anyone use them?
Re: Best quality f/v
Thanks all
Think i like the s/s 30 litre stock pot,I will nip on flea bay and see what size they are.
cheers joe.
Think i like the s/s 30 litre stock pot,I will nip on flea bay and see what size they are.
cheers joe.
- Jocky
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Re: Best quality f/v
Interesting.hotmog wrote:I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean.![]()
Do you use your stock pots for anything other than fermenting? Just wondering how your whole process work with them.
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.
Re: Best quality f/v
I was thinking about getting some stainless pots to ferment in, but I was looking at doing it due to fact that my plastic fermenters seem to absorb a lot of hop aroma that I think a stainless pot would leave in the beer.
- hotmog
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
- Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
- Contact:
Re: Best quality f/v
No, they're only used as FVs. I brew in 38l lengths, ie enough for 2 x 19l cornies, so each stockpot is just under 2/3rds full, which allows adequate headroom for the foam when the cooled wort is poured in from the boiler, and later for the yeast krausen.Jocky wrote:Interesting.hotmog wrote:I used to use plastic FVs, but have since graduated to two 30l S/S stockpots. Much better, and so much easier to clean.![]()
Do you use your stock pots for anything other than fermenting? Just wondering how your whole process work with them.
The shelf on which they sit is about 12" above the height of a cornie, so once the fermentation's over I can transfer direct by gravity. No need for siphon tubes, nor even to lift the lid, thus minimising the risk of airborne infection. Prior to filling, I sterilise the stockpots by pouring in a kettle-full of boiling water, swilling it around and leaving for several minutes, then emptying and spraying all over with StarSan.
- Jocky
- Even further under the Table
- Posts: 2738
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 6:50 pm
- Location: Epsom, Surrey, UK
Re: Best quality f/v
Does the position of the taps on your stock pots not cause them to pick up a lot of trub?
Ingredients: Water, Barley, Hops, Yeast, Seaweed, Blood, Sweat, The swim bladder of a sturgeon, My enemies tears, Scenes of mild peril, An otter's handbag and Riboflavin.
- hotmog
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
- Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
- Contact:
Re: Best quality f/v
No. Before I connect the line to to the cornie, I open the tap into a glass underneath to collect the first runnings that contain the yeast sediment immediately under the pipe opening, which I discard (it's only a small cupful). By careful positioning of the tap hole, and using a 15mm copper elbow facing downwards on the inside so that there is only a 2mm gap between the opening and the bottom, there is virtually no wastage whatsoever. The yeast sediment immediately underneath the elbow opening is obviously drawn up, but that really is a minimal amount and nothing around it is disturbed. There is no need to tip the FV up to drain to the last drop - it does that automatically. There is only a very thin surface covering of liquid left above the yeast.Jocky wrote:Does the position of the taps on your stock pots not cause them to pick up a lot of trub?
Obviously, for this to work you need to exploit the syphon effect fully. I connect the FV ball-valve taps to the cornie outlet posts via JG 1/2" BSP - 3/8" connectors, and there is around a 9" - 12" drop to the cornie positioned beneath.
Re: Best quality f/v
Is that THREE STIR PLATES?!?!?!
I never envisaged needing more than one!
Now I have a more like 80L brew length perhaps I'll start building the next one. 3 batches each with a different yeast
I never envisaged needing more than one!
Now I have a more like 80L brew length perhaps I'll start building the next one. 3 batches each with a different yeast
- hotmog
- Piss Artist
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 6:02 pm
- Location: Worcester Park, Surrey
- Contact:
Re: Best quality f/v
Three's not excessiveBelter wrote:Is that THREE STIR PLATES?!?!?!
I never envisaged needing more than one!
Now I have a more like 80L brew length perhaps I'll start building the next one. 3 batches each with a different yeast

It all boiled down to a choice of making two stir-plates for 2 x 3l conicals, or making three for 3 x 2l conicals. I couldn't get hold of any 3l ones, and they are prohibitively expensive anyway, so I opted for the second option.
My rationale was quite simple: when I first decided to venture into the mysterious world of liquid yeast I sought advice on this forum about the best way to proceed. Being a tight-arsed git, I wanted to make a stepped starter from just 1/3rd of single vial of Whitelabs that would be enough for my 38l brew length. The received wisdom (many thanks to Wolfy especially) was that I needed a 3-step starter.
Step 1 - 250ml
Step 2 -> 1 ltr
Step 3 -> 3.5 ltr
Given that the conicals can realistically only be filled up to less than half their maximum capacity when used for for this purpose, you will probably now appreciate why I needed three of them, each with their own stir-plate, to accomplish Step 3
