grain:water

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
Post Reply
buckfast

grain:water

Post by buckfast » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:27 am

Hello all
A quick question. What is an ideal grain to water ratio in the mash tun?

I'm starting to panic a bit, I'm having a bash at my first AG on Saturday for the first time in about two years. :?

Cheers

mysterio

Post by mysterio » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:38 am

Whatever you feel comfortable with, anywhere between 2 & 3 L per kilo of grain is fine, I find 2.5L/kg gives a good consistency to stir.

buckfast

Post by buckfast » Fri Mar 07, 2008 1:44 am

Thank you.
It's a bloody good job I found this forum. :lol:

Cheers

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Fri Mar 07, 2008 9:35 am

I use around 3 to 3.5 L/Kg, its a bit runny, but I have a large mash tun. I have dropped as low as 2.3L/Kg when brewing bigger volumes. and on one occasion dropped below 2L/Kg . . . . It was a nice barley wine, but very chewy, as the increased thickness of the mash caused the beta amylase to work much more slowly . . . Its a factor that is more obvious with larger beers than smaller ones.

johnh

Post by johnh » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:39 am

I always start on the low side (2-2.5) just in case I have to correct the mash temp with hot/cold water additions later on. Not that I ever have to of course... :roll: :oops:

Martin the fish

Post by Martin the fish » Fri Mar 07, 2008 11:53 am

Aleman wrote: its a bit runny, but I have a large mash tun
:shock: :shock: :shock:

Sorry Aleman, couldn't resist. :lol:

stevezx7r

Post by stevezx7r » Fri Mar 07, 2008 3:14 pm

So, what chemical reactions occur if using more water i.e. 4l per kg?

johnh

Post by johnh » Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:39 pm

stevezx7r wrote:So, what chemical reactions occur if using more water i.e. 4l per kg?
I just found the answer to that in Palmer's How To Brew.
The grist/water ratio is the least significant factor influencing the performance of the mash. A thinner mash of more than 4 l/kg dilutes the relative concentrations of the enzymes, slowing the conversion, and leads to quicker denaturing, but could ultimately lead to a more fermentable mash, because the enzymes are not inhibited by a high concentration of sugars.

nobby

Post by nobby » Sun Mar 09, 2008 11:45 am

Aleman wrote:I use around 3 to 3.5 L/Kg, its a bit runny, but I have a large mash tun. I have dropped as low as 2.3L/Kg when brewing bigger volumes. and on one occasion dropped below 2L/Kg . . . . It was a nice barley wine, but very chewy, as the increased thickness of the mash caused the beta amylase to work much more slowly . . . Its a factor that is more obvious with larger beers than smaller ones.
Aleman: How does using a higher ratio water:Grain effect your PH ???

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:10 pm

nobby wrote:
Aleman wrote:I use around 3 to 3.5 L/Kg
Aleman: How does using a higher ratio water:Grain effect your PH ???
It doesn't really, our water is so low in alkalinity that we get a pretty stable mash pH regardless of how much or little we mash in with . . .



Thinking about it though . . . as long as you treat your water to reduce the alkalinity then there should be little effect on mash pH from different liquor to grist ratios . . . if you have high alkalinity and don't treat your liquor then your pH will be higher in a thin mash that a thick one . . . . Measurable??? Don't know, never brewed in an area with High alkalinity

AT

Post by AT » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:21 pm

Aleman forgive the stupid question but what is considered high? my water is
alkalinity 161mg/l (hardness 190mg/l), how does that fair up?

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Sun Mar 09, 2008 8:52 pm

AT wrote:Aleman forgive the stupid question but what is considered high? my water is
alkalinity 161mg/l (hardness 190mg/l), how does that fair up?
Mine averages around 18mg/l, so anything higher than that could be considered high (as far as I am concerned :) ) The preferred maximum for brewing purposes is 50ppm (ales), so I would consider anything over that to be high and require treating . . . . Yours isn't the highest though, I have heard of brewers with alkalinity in the 300mg/l which are a PITA to brew pale ales with.

User avatar
Aleman
It's definitely Lock In Time
Posts: 6132
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 11:56 am
Location: Mashing In Blackpool, Lancashire, UK

Post by Aleman » Mon Mar 10, 2008 10:17 am

DaaB wrote:Mine's 266mg/l. 200-300 is classed as hard, above 300, hard.
Yeah, I try and avoid the use of the word Hard in relation to alkalinity as people tend to get it confused with Hardness . . . . When its really totally unrelated, just the stupid water boards way of reporting it.

You can for example have a water with low alkalinity and yet have incredibly high Hardness - High Calcium and Magnesium (derived ffrom sulphate salts rather than carbonate ones).

;)

Post Reply