Muntons Conker Ale - Stuck at 1020, options???
Muntons Conker Ale - Stuck at 1020, options???
I brewed a Muntons Conker Ale which has unfortunately stuck at 1020, it started at 1046 and has now been stuck for 2 days. I've tried rousing with now effect and have pitched some more yeast - all of which have made little difference.
Any other options or should I just keg it - it tastes fine so i don't want to ruin it? Any ideas
Kev
Any other options or should I just keg it - it tastes fine so i don't want to ruin it? Any ideas
Kev
The only option I can think of is dry beer enzyme, but that's likely to make it taste dry and thin.
Have you gone through all the options on the stuck fermentation FAQ?
Have you gone through all the options on the stuck fermentation FAQ?
You could try yeast nutrient, it has worked for people in the past, but from what I've read the success rate is low. You have to take care that you don't add too much as it it does leave an odd taste if the yeast doesn't get to work on it.
I normally draw the line at 1016, but I reckon if you've tried everything sensible to get it down from 1020, I would risk bottling/kegging it now - especially if it tastes okay. I'd sooner put up with ½% or so less ABV than have 5 gallons of something undrinkable.
I normally draw the line at 1016, but I reckon if you've tried everything sensible to get it down from 1020, I would risk bottling/kegging it now - especially if it tastes okay. I'd sooner put up with ½% or so less ABV than have 5 gallons of something undrinkable.
Last edited by sparky Paul on Fri Aug 22, 2008 6:47 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chuck it down the drain - I wouldnt drink anything under 3.4899328859060402684563758389265%PeteH wrote:1046-1020/7.45=3.4899328859060402684563758389262 ish.Shoit wrote:Hi there,
I've tried all the options apart from the yeast nutrient. If i do keg it at 1020, what will the alcohol content be from a OG of 1046?
Kev

I would be reluctant to bottle a brew at 20, but I would happily keg it.sparky Paul wrote:You could try yeast nutrient, it has worked for people in the past, but from what I've read the success rate is low. You have to take care that you don't add too much as it it does least an odd taste if the yeast doesn't get to work on it.
I normally draw the line at 1016, but I reckon if you've tried everything sensible to get it down from 1020, I would risk bottling/kegging it now - especially if it tastes okay. I'd sooner put up with ½% or so less ABV than have 5 gallons of something undrinkable.
You're right Jim, I was thinking about my own favourite MO of PET bottling. I would PET bottle it, perhaps with less priming sugar, but I certainly wouldn't dare put it in glass bottles at 1020. As you say, kegging would be safe as houses with the relief valve on the cap.Jim wrote:I would be reluctant to bottle a brew at 20, but I would happily keg it.
The beer could be a little sweeter, but it would be very marginal.Shoit wrote:What are the risks of bottling it at 1020? Will it develop a dodgy taste or just explode?
The main risk is of making bottle bombs. If the fermentation did continue very slowly, and eventually got to the desired FG, the excess CO2 produced may make the glass ones go bang. PETs are safer, they don't shatter into nasty shards, and you can monitor the pressure with the 'thumb test' - and release it if you think the bottles are getting too hard before they start clearing down. Kegging would always be best, for the reasons above.
Good to hear it's dropped a little more, quite a few of my 100% extract brews finish around 1015-16, so you're not too far away.