Eskimo Stout - Firstt All Grain

Get advice on making beer from raw ingredients (malt, hops, water and yeast)
Post Reply
Niall K

Eskimo Stout - Firstt All Grain

Post by Niall K » Thu Apr 26, 2007 4:09 pm

Going to try my first all grain this Saturday. Trying eskimobob's stout. I have all the ingredients ready and will take pictures of my first all grain and post them up. Here is the recipe:


2500g Pale malt
400g Roasted Barley
1000g Flaked Barley
57g Fuggles (for last 60 mins)
5g Irish Moss (for last 15 mins)

Mash for 90 mins at about 64C
Boil for 90 mins
Original gravity 1038
Final Gravity 1012
IBU 32
Efficiency 85%
White Labs (WLP004) liquid yeast

Firstly, what amount of water do I need to add to the mash and what is the best way of working out the strike temp? Also how much do I need to collect before boiling to achieve a 19liter batch at the end?

Frothy

Post by Frothy » Thu Apr 26, 2007 8:05 pm

There is an enthalpy calculation you can use to work out the strike temp but convention is 2.5L/kg @ 71-74oc to achieve a 64-67oc strike temp. The mash temp' and duration has an effect on the body or dryness of the finished beer, with a stout you may be as well to aim for the higher end to give the beer more body.

As for how much evaporation you'l experience during the boil this will depend on your boiler. With a big propane burner I loose anywhere between 20 & 30% of the boil volume over an hour. It's a good idea to collect the runnings to 1.005 and use any excess to top up the boil at the end.

EB's efficiency there is pretty optimistic at 85%. I'll only achieve 65% usually and so would adjust the recipe accordingly.

Frothy

retourrbx

Post by retourrbx » Thu Apr 26, 2007 9:30 pm


notassuch

Post by notassuch » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:58 pm

Hi Niall,

I completely agree with Frothy on the efficiency.
85% is for the tried and tested brewhouse. My first brew was EB Stout and I adjusted the bill, guessing
that I'd hit much lower than this. I got 69% by fly sparging with a watering can rose.
If you go for Frothy's suggested 65% then BeerSmith scales it as follows;

Pale Malt - 3269g
Roasted Barley - 523g
Flaked Barley - 1308g

The one thing I would change with my first brew would be to top-up the volume lost to evaporation
with wort, rather than water. So aim the efficiency as low as you like. The grain is the cheapest
part of your whole setup.

Oh, and get your camera out on Saturday, or you'll upset Max. :wink:

SteveD

Post by SteveD » Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:28 pm

Frothy wrote:With a big propane burner I loose anywhere between 20 & 30% of the boil volume over an hour.
Bloody hell! Why don't you...er....just....turn it down?....a bit? :D

SteveD

Post by SteveD » Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:34 pm

notassuch wrote:
The one thing I would change with my first brew would be to top-up the volume lost to evaporationwith wort, rather than water.
Or..if you had a big boiler, you'd just sparge down till you had the preboil volume you needed, or down to 1010-1006, and not to have to top up at all.

...........runs away! :lol:

Frothy

Post by Frothy » Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:24 am

SteveD wrote:Why don't you...er....just....turn it down?....a bit? :D
That is turned down :) I read in some sci' paper that the optimum boil reduction is 10% of the wort volume, this allows for sufficient coagulation of proteins and dispersal of some undesirable aromatic compounds.

Frothy

notassuch

Post by notassuch » Fri Apr 27, 2007 12:33 am

SteveD wrote:just sparge down till you had the preboil volume you needed
Oh yeah, there is that...... trouble maker! :D

iowalad
Under the Table
Posts: 1120
Joined: Wed Dec 13, 2006 3:22 am
Location: Iowa

Post by iowalad » Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:33 am

I have to work on tuning my down as well - same 20% problem. Nice tip on the top up.

Niall K

Post by Niall K » Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:08 am

Thanks for all the replies. Cant wait until tommorrow.
Oh, and get your camera out on Saturday, or you'll upset Max.
Dont worry, I will have all the pictures of my day :D

With regards to sparging, I have a insulated mash tun with a sparge arm. I have read that sparging should take anywere up to 40 min to 1 hour. Surely when I fill up my boiler with sparg water, it takes only the time for the sparg water to fully empty through the sparge arm. If this takes 15 min will that be ok or do you have to adjust the tap of the boiler to release less sparge water to give it more time to run through :?

User avatar
bitter_dave
Even further under the Table
Posts: 2170
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:00 pm
Location: Whitley Bay

Post by bitter_dave » Fri Apr 27, 2007 8:43 am

Niall K wrote:With regards to sparging, I have a insulated mash tun with a sparge arm. I have read that sparging should take anywere up to 40 min to 1 hour. Surely when I fill up my boiler with sparg water, it takes only the time for the sparg water to fully empty through the sparge arm. If this takes 15 min will that be ok or do you have to adjust the tap of the boiler to release less sparge water to give it more time to run through :?
You don't want the sparge arm to rotate too quickly. If the boiler you're using as a hot liqor tank has an adjustable tap you can adjust the flow to slow it down. If, like mine, it doesn't - i.e. it's either 'on' or 'off' you can adjust the flow by adding pegs to the plastic tubing. I got this tip off road runner

here. Works a treat :wink:

Obviously you need to use your judgement, and I would only adjust the flow if it was spinning like crazy. I find I add pegs at the beginning and remove them as the flow slows a bit, but the flow obviously depends on the height of the hot liquor tank etc. so you may not need to.

Anyway, good luck :wink:

SteveD

Post by SteveD » Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:08 am

DaaB wrote:If pegs are an alien item in your house as they are in mine, hose clamps are available for a few pence and are useful for stemming the flow.

Image
Or a minature vice, which which you can regulate the flow very precisely

eskimobob

Post by eskimobob » Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:45 pm

Frothy wrote:EB's efficiency there is pretty optimistic at 85%. I'll only achieve 65% usually and so would adjust the recipe accordingly.
Yes, I would definitely not expect you to get 85% on your first brew :shock: :lol: I do seem to find that stouts achieve a higher efficiency for me though than bitters - probably to do with my water chemistry.
SteveD wrote:Or a minature vice, which which you can regulate the flow very precisely
Exactly what I use - works perfectly. :D

Best of luck Niall - looking forward to the Pics tomorrow :wink:

Post Reply