I have S-04, Nottingham and a 3-months out of date but stored in the fridge Windsor available in the yeast stocks. Which would work best for a porter? TIA

[offtopic]This kind of thing interests me. At agricultural shows animals are judged on their conformation to a set standard, so being 'as close to breed' as possible is how they win a rosette. Is there any analagous 'standard' in beer style terms? Is there a (inter)nationally recognised standard for a porter? If there is, how does it differ to a stout? Or is that asking the question that's been asked a million times before?David Edge wrote:Commercial brewers have some pretty broad ideas of what makes a porter - all they had in common was the colour!
...The National Guild of Wine and Beer Judges suggest that a porter should be full and with a little residual sweetness to balance the hop and roast grain...
Yes; there has to be. It helps consumers know what they are being offered and judges to judge what is best in a competition. That's not to say they closest to the definition wins, rather a balanced beer within the standard with a bit of a wow! factor will come out on top.Is there any analagous 'standard' in beer style terms? Is there a (inter)nationally recognised standard for a porter?
Go along to a beer competition and volunteer yourself as a steward! All will be revealed. A couple of hours free tuition from someone who will generally be a champion brewer with a decade or two of experience.The Guild's 'suggestion' appears equally broad to my untrained palette/eye and maybe I'm becoming overly obsessed with defining a beer when I should be more concerned with its characteristics.
I thought as much.David Edge wrote:Several standards exists though
That definately sounds like a good idea. Really want to be able to appreciate the fine differences, the 'extra' that's put into a quality pint. At the moment I just like it lol.David Edge wrote:Go along to a beer competition and volunteer yourself as a steward!
Which then becomes a style guide for a generation, everyone I know thinks a stout will just taste like Guinness.TJB wrote:The problem with 'commercial' beers is that the style is merely a marketing label.
Commercially it perhaps makes it harder, but I think it certainly allows the creative homebrewer more opportunities to have a go at something different, even if it does make a judge's job harder! Now what would a peanut butter and jam wheat beer come under?TJB wrote:Personally I like the broad standards, and using those and what I've read about the style, formulating my own recipe for a beer 'in the style of' is much more fun
Quite so. BJCP styles are the most tightly defined, UK 'Guild' less so and at the festivals anything goes. However, if you want judging there needs to be some reference. There's little point in entering a porter that's blonde apart from some minor amusement (as happened this year).Blackpool's Finest wrote:Personally I like the broad standards, and using those and what I've read about the style, formulating my own recipe for a beer 'in the style of' is much more fun
Pale special. Dave Ranger's probably already done it. See page 1 of http://craftbrewing.org.uk/bcpdf/BC5-3_sep2005.pdfwhat would a peanut butter and jam wheat beer come under
If you don't judge or steward you won't get to taste at a traditional show. Some of these things are followed by bunfights in the evening (maybe even a tea dance) at which bottles may come out.If you don't enter and don't judge do you get to taste?