
Not sure about the color, but you could up the chocolate malt to 500g and it will add to the roastness of the porter
500g of chocolate would be a bit too overpowering IMO. Might as well forget the brown if you're going to do that. Chocolate malt is cloying if used too heavily. Add a bit of black malt for colour adjustment. 2 - 3Oz would do it. Historically accurate, as well.oblivious wrote:Recipe looks good, might doing it in the near future![]()
Not sure about the color, but you could up the chocolate malt to 500g and it will add to the roastness of the porter
sorrySteveD wrote:500g of chocolate would be a bit too overpowering IMO. Might as well forget the brown if you're going to do that. Chocolate malt is cloying if used too heavily. Add a bit of black malt for colour adjustment. 2 - 3Oz would do it. Historically accurate, as well.oblivious wrote:Recipe looks good, might doing it in the near future![]()
Not sure about the color, but you could up the chocolate malt to 500g and it will add to the roastness of the porter
Pale amber was typically 30EBC while diastatic is around 50EBC. I tend to mix pale and diastatic where pale amber is required.Is that pale amber malt similar to diastatic amber malt?
I'm not convinced it will convert more than its own weight although I can't cite any evidence other than that I've struggled with it. It's the other reason I cut it 60:40 with pale. Note too when using large quantities of diastatic amber that dia-amber grist isn't very fermentable. A 100% dia-amber grist only attenuated from 1104 to 1054 for me.Pale amber is diastatic, so you can use that in conjunction with pale to help convert non diastatic grains. I would think that its diastatic power is pretty good, being made from a higher nitrogen barley than pale is, and kilned quite gently.